Physical Education for Health Among School-Aged Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review of Reviews

Author:

Ramires Virgílio Viana1ORCID,dos Santos Priscila Cristina2ORCID,Barbosa Filho Valter Cordeiro3ORCID,Bandeira Alexsandra da Silva2ORCID,Marinho Tenório Maria Cecilia4ORCID,de Camargo Edina Maria5ORCID,Ravagnani Fabrício Cesar de Paula6ORCID,Sandreschi Paula7ORCID,de Oliveira Victor José Machado8ORCID,Hallal Pedro Curi9ORCID,Silva Kelly Samara2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physical Education, Federal Institute Sul-rio-grandense–IFSUL, Campus Pelotas, Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil

2. Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil

3. Federal Institute of Ceará, Aracati, Ceará, Brazil

4. Department of Physical Education, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil

5. Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Paraná–UFPR, Curitiba, PR, Brazil

6. Department of Physical Education, Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Mato Grosso do Sul–Campus Campo Grande, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil

7. Department of Health Promotion, Ministry of Health of Brazil, Brasília, DF, Brazil

8. Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, AM, Brazil

9. Department of Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas–UFPEL, Pelotas, RS, Brazil

Abstract

Background: Physical education (PE) classes in schools are considered relevant to implement interventions, especially focused on physical activity. However, evidence overviews on how PE classes contribute to general health (physical, social, affective, and cognitive domains) are still needed. Thus, we summarized evidence synthesis (eg, systematic reviews) that addressed the contribution of PE classes to the health of school-aged children and adolescents. Methods: We performed a scoping review with searches in 8 databases and institutional websites to find systematic reviews or meta-analyses that answered this review’s research question. Data charting form included the identification of the study, health outcomes, and PE classes’ strategies (policies and environment, curriculum, appropriate instructions, and evaluation). An interactive process was performed to build the evidence summary. Results: An initial search yielded 2264 titles, and 49 systematic reviews (including 11 with meta-analysis) were included in this review. Most documents reported the main benefits of PE classes on physical domain outcomes (eg, physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, body mass index, and fundamental motor skills). However, evidence on the benefits of PE classes in affective (eg, enjoyment, motivation, and autonomy); social (eg, cooperation, problem-solving, and making friends); and cognitive (eg, memory, attention, concentration, and decision making) domains were found. Strategies on PE classes for health benefits were highlighted. Conclusions: These elements were detailed in the evidence summary, which may be considered to guide researchers, teachers, and practitioners to define research and practice priorities on PE class interventions for health in the school context.

Publisher

Human Kinetics

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Epidemiology,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference111 articles.

1. Making Every School a Health-Promoting School: Implementation Guidance,2021

2. OECD Handbook for Internationally Comparative Education Statistics 2018: Concepts, Standards, Definitions and Classifications

3. School Health Guidelines to Promote Healthy Eating and Physical Activity,2011

4. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report,2018

5. Comprehensive School Physical Activity Programs: Helping All Students Log 60 Minutes of Physical Activity Each Day [Position Statement],2013

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3