An Assessment of State-Level Planning for Physical Activity Promotion in the United States

Author:

Kohl Harold W.12ORCID,Johnson Ashleigh M.3ORCID,Dooley Erin E.4ORCID,Towner Brooke5,Pate Russell R.6ORCID,Heischmidt Kurt7,Elliott Eloise M.8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Austin, TX, USA

2. Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

3. School of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA

4. Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

5. Department of Recreation Management and Physical Education, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA

6. Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

7. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

8. College of Applied Human Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA

Abstract

The prevalence and attributable risk of disease due to physical inactivity require it to be made a public health priority. Public health planning allows for prioritization and resource allocation, particularly at the state and local levels. The extent to which state planning efforts for physical activity exist in the United States is unknown. The purpose of this paper is to describe the scope in which physical activity is incorporated in state-level public health plans in the United States, with an emphasis on alignment with the national guidelines and the National Physical Activity Plan. A standardized internet search audit was developed and conducted for each of 50 US states and the District of Columbia between May 2017 and January 2018 to determine the prevalence and characteristics of health planning documents that include physical activity. Data abstracted for analysis used a standardized search protocol that included the components of the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans and the US National Physical Activity Plan. Results found that most states had between 4 and 6 chronic disease prevention and control plans that mention physical activity; however, it was inconsistently aligned with recommendations from both the Guidelines and the National Plan. Only 2 states had stand-alone public health planning documents explicitly dedicated to physical activity promotion. No state planning documents addressed children and adolescents, adults, and older adults simultaneously. To be maximally effective, state public health planning for physical activity should be made a priority and these efforts should align as much as possible with current guidance from the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans and the US National Physical Activity Plan.

Publisher

Human Kinetics

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Epidemiology,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference17 articles.

1. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy;Lee IM,2012

2. Physical activity,2022

3. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2nd edition

4. Global Action Plan for Physical Activity: 2018–2030,2018

5. From physical activity guidelines to a national activity plan;Bornstein DB,2014

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3