Understanding the Interaction of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Visual Feedback During an Ankle Movement Task

Author:

Cummings Mark12ORCID,Doshi Aditi13ORCID,Madhavan Sangeetha1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Brain Plasticity Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA

2. Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA

3. Graduate Program in Neuroscience, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA

Abstract

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been demonstrated to facilitate motor performance in healthy individuals; however, results are variable. The neuromodulatory effects of tDCS during visuomotor tasks may be influenced by extrinsic visual feedback. However, this interaction between tDCS and visual feedback has not been explored for the lower limb. Hence, our objective was to explore if tDCS over the primary lower limb motor cortex differentially facilitates motor performance based on the availability of visual feedback. Methods: Twenty-two neurotypical adults performed ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion movements while tracking a sinusoidal target. Spatiotemporal, spatial, and temporal error were calculated between the ankle position and target. Participants attended two sessions, a week apart, with (Stim) and without (No-Stim) anodal tDCS. Sessions were divided into two blocks containing randomized visual feedback conditions: full, no, and blindfold. During Stim sessions, the first block included the application of tDCS to the lower limb M1. Results: Spatiotemporal and spatial error increased as feedback faded (p < .001). A two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance showed a significant interaction between tDCS and visual feedback (p < .05) on spatiotemporal error. Post hoc analyses revealed a significant improvement in spatiotemporal error when visual feedback was absent (p < .01). Spatial and temporal errors were not significantly affected by stimulation or visual feedback. Discussion: Our results suggest that tDCS enhances spatiotemporal ankle motor performance only when visual feedback is not available. These findings indicate that visual feedback may play an important role in demonstrating the effectiveness of tDCS.

Publisher

Human Kinetics

Subject

Physiology (medical),Neurology (clinical),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference54 articles.

1. The homeostatic interaction between anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and motor learning in humans is related to GABAA activity;Amadi, U.,2015

2. Brain stimulation and physical performance;Angius, L.,2018

3. Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines;Antal, A.,2017

4. Facilitation of visuo‐motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor and extrastriate visual areas in humans;Antal, A.,2004

5. The neuropsychology of visuospatial and visuomotor development;Atkinson, J.,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3