Author:
Francis Claire E.,Longmuir Patricia E.,Boyer Charles,Andersen Lars Bo,Barnes Joel D.,Boiarskaia Elena,Cairney John,Faigenbaum Avery D.,Faulkner Guy,Hands Beth P.,Hay John A.,Janssen Ian,Katzmarzyk Peter T.,Kemper Han C. G.,Knudson Duane,Lloyd Meghann,McKenzie Thomas L.,Olds Tim S.,Sacheck Jennifer M.,Shephard Roy J.,Zhu Weimo,Tremblay Mark S.
Abstract
Background:The Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy (CAPL) was conceptualized as a tool to monitor children’s physical literacy. The original model (fitness, activity behavior, knowledge, motor skill) required revision and relative weights for calculating/interpreting scores were required.Methods:Nineteen childhood physical activity/fitness experts completed a 3-round Delphi process. Round 1 was open-ended questions. Subsequent rounds rated statements using a 5-point Likert scale. Recommendations were sought regarding protocol inclusion, relative importance within composite scores and score interpretation.Results:Delphi participant consensus was achieved for 64% (47/73) of statement topics, including a revised conceptual model, specific assessment protocols, the importance of longitudinal tracking, and the relative importance of individual protocols and composite scores. Divergent opinions remained regarding the inclusion of sleep time, assessment/scoring of the obstacle course assessment of motor skill, and the need for an overall physical literacy classification.Conclusions:The revised CAPL model (overlapping domains of physical competence, motivation, and knowledge, encompassed by daily behavior) is appropriate for monitoring the physical literacy of children aged 8 to 12 years. Objectively measured domains (daily behavior, physical competence) have higher relative importance. The interpretation of CAPL results should be reevaluated as more data become available.
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Cited by
89 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献