Outdoor Community Ambulation Interventions to Improve Physical and Mental Health in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Bhatia Dominika1,Salbach Nancy M.2345,Akinrolie Olayinka6,Alsbury-Nealy Kyla24,dos Santos Renato Barbosa7,Eftekhar Parvin38,Loewen Hal9,Nekolaichuk Erica10,Scheller Chelsea11,Schorr Rebecca5,Scodras Stephanie24,Barclay Ruth5

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

2. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

3. KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

4. Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

5. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada

6. Applied Health Sciences Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada

7. Master’s and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo—UNICID, São Paulo, Brazil

8. Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

9. Neil John Maclean Health Sciences Library, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada

10. Gerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

11. College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada

Abstract

Limited community ambulation, defined as independent mobility outside the home, predicts adverse outcomes in older adults. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine outdoor community ambulation intervention effectiveness in older adults. We searched six databases until October 2021. Studies with an evaluative research objective, older adult population, and outdoor community ambulation interventions were eligible. After reviewing 23,172 records, five studies were included. The meta-analysis found no significant difference in walking endurance and depression outcomes between outdoor community ambulation and comparison interventions. For outcomes not suitable for meta-analysis, studies showed no significant difference in walking activity, anxiety, and general and health-related quality of life, and possible improvements in gait speed and lower extremity function and strength. Most evidence was of low to very low certainty. Considering the limited evidence base, the design, implementation, and evaluation of outdoor community ambulation interventions in older adults should be prioritized in primary research.

Publisher

Human Kinetics

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3