Validity of the German Version of Daily Activity Behaviours Questionnaire Among Older Adults-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Validity of the German Version of Daily Activity Behaviours Questionnaire Among Older Adults

Published:2023-12-01 Issue:6 Volume:31 Page:1016-1022
ISSN:1063-8652
Container-title:Journal of Aging and Physical Activity
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Kastelic Kaja¹²³^ORCID,Löfler Stefan³⁴^ORCID,Matko Špela³⁴,Šarabon Nejc²³⁵^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Andrej Marušič Institute, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia

2. InnoRenew CoE, Izola, Slovenia

3. Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, St. Pölten, Austria

4. Center of Active Ageing—Competence Centre for Health, Prevention and Active Ageing, St. Pölten, Austria

5. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Izola, Slovenia

Abstract

Time spent in physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep collectively impact health of older adults. There is a need for valid self-reported methods for the assessment of movement behaviors across the entire 24-hr day. The aim of this study was to explore the validity of the German version of Daily Activity Behaviours Questionnaire (DABQ), the “Schlaf- und Aktivitätsfragebogen (SAF),” among older adults. Participants were asked to wear activity monitor (activPAL) for a period of 8 days and to complete the German version of DABQ. Seventy-seven participants (45 females; 68 ± 5 years of age) completed the protocol. Spearman’s correlation coefficients between DABQ and activPAL estimates for time spent in sleep, sedentary behavior, light physical activity, and moderate to vigorous physical activity were .69, .35, .24, and .52, respectively. The German version of the DABQ showed satisfactory validity to be used in epidemiological research and population surveillance among older adults.

Publisher

Human Kinetics

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Link

https://journals.humankinetics.com/downloadpdf/journals/japa/31/6/article-p1016.xml

Reference34 articles.

1. 2018 Physical activity guidelines advisory committee scientific report,2018

2. Validity and reliability of subjective methods to assess sedentary behaviour in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis;Bakker, E.A.,2020

3. Sample size requirements for estimating Pearson, Kendall and Spearman correlations;Bonett, D.G.,2000

4. Validity of two awake wear-time classification algorithms for activPAL in youth, adults, and older adults;Carlson, A.J.,2021

5. Sleep duration and health in adults: An overview of systematic reviews;Chaput, J.-P.,2020

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Validity and reliability of self-reported methods for assessment of 24-h movement behaviours: a systematic review;International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity;2024-08-02