Increased Ability to Perceive Relevant Sensory Information Minimizes Low Back Exposures in Lifting

Author:

Armstrong Daniel P.1ORCID,Horslen Brian C.1ORCID,Fischer Steven L.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada

Abstract

We have previously shown evidence that some individuals seem to consistently minimize low back loads when lifting, while others do not. However, it is unknown why. Individual differences in ability to perceive relevant sensory information may explain differences in minimization of low back loads during lifting, consistent with considering load reduction in one’s movement objective in an optimal feedback control theory framework. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether individuals’ ability to perceive proprioceptive information (both force- and posture-senses) at the low back was associated with peak low back loads when performing generic or occupation-specific lifts. Seventy-two participants were recruited to perform 10 barbell (generic) and backboard (occupation-specific) lifts, while whole-body kinematics and ground reaction forces were collected. Peak low back compression and anteroposterior shear forces normalized to body mass were calculated as dependent variables. Both posture matching ability and force matching ability at the heavier force targets were associated with lower means and variability of peak low-back loads in both lift types, albeit with small effect sizes (R2 ≤ .17). These findings support the utility of an optimal feedback control theory framework to explore factors explaining interindividual differences in low back loads during lifting. Further, this evidence suggests improving proprioceptive ability may be a useful strategy in lift training programs designed for workplace injury prevention.

Publisher

Human Kinetics

Subject

Physiology (medical),Neurology (clinical),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference54 articles.

1. Are males and females similarly consistent in their respective lifting patterns?;Albert, W.J.,2008

2. A comparative study of two trunk biomechanical models under symmetric and asymmetric loadings;Arjmand, N.,2010

3. Understanding individual differences in lifting mechanics: Do some people adopt motor control strategies that minimize biomechanical exposure;Armstrong, D.P.,2020

4. Ranking stretcher and backboard related paramedic lifting tasks based on their biomechanical demand on the low back;Armstrong, D.P.,2020

5. Local dynamic stability of the spine and its coordinated lower joints during repetitive lifting: Effects of fatigue and chronic low back pain;Asgari, N.,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3