An Analysis of Identity Conflict Among Health-Conscious Sport Fans

Author:

Mansfield Aaron C.1,Melton E. Nicole2,Katz Matthew2

Affiliation:

1. Merrimack College, North Andover, MA, USA

2. University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA

Abstract

Scholars have begun to explore the interplay between the multiple identities within a sport fan’s salience hierarchy, noting fandom may compete with other central roles. Researchers have also recently emphasized well-being outcomes for fans, with increasing focus on physical health. Though sport consumer behavior and health consciousness have concurrently emerged, the social psychological connection between the two is unclear. Thus, we aim to clarify this relationship. We leverage an emerging quantitative approach: polynomial regression and response surface methodology. Our findings indicate individuals who value both fandom and health consciousness (i.e., demonstrate high fan identity and health consciousness congruence) experience identity conflict, with men reporting higher levels of identity conflict than women. Thus, we contribute to literature on the potential negative sides (or challenges) of fan identity. The food and sedentarism common to fan culture appear to prompt psychological turmoil for health-conscious individuals. Fan identity may naturally integrate with other social roles, yet our results indicate fandom and health consciousness are often viewed in conflict.

Publisher

Human Kinetics

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Decision Sciences

Reference92 articles.

1. Health-conscious consumers and the demand for holistic nutrition;Afable, M.V.,2019

2. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions;Aiken, L.S.,1991

3. Culture, race/ethnicity and disparities: Fleshing out the socio-cultural framework for health services disparities;Alegria, M.,2011

4. Demographic and socioeconomic determinants of physical and mental self-rated health across 10 ethnic groups in the United States;Assari, S.,2017

5. Undertrusted, overtrusted, or just right? The fairness of (in)congruence between trust wanted and trust received;Baer, M.D.,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3