Intent-Related Differences in Surface EMG of Maximum Eccentric and Concentric Contractions

Abstract

For this study it was hypothesized that when participants intended to perform a maximum voluntary concentric (or eccentric) contraction but had an eccentric (or concentric) contraction imposed upon them, the initial EMG measured during the isometric phase preceding the onset of the dynamometer motion would reflect the intended contraction condition. The surface EMG of the vastus lateralis muscle was measured in 24 participants performing isokinetic concentric and eccentric maximum voluntary knee extensor contractions. The contractions were initiated from rest and from the same knee flexion angle and required the same level of external force to trigger the onset of dynamometer motion. Vastus lateralis EMG were quantified during the isometric phase preceding the onset of the dynamometer motion. When participants intended to perform a concentric contraction but had an eccentric contraction imposed upon them, the initial EMG resembled that of a concentric contraction. When they intended to perform an eccentric contraction but had a concentric contraction imposed upon them, the initial EMG resembled that of an eccentric contraction. Overall, the difference between concentric and eccentric contractions observed during the period of theinitialmuscle activation implies that descending signals include information that distinguishes between eccentric and concentric contractions.