Affiliation:
1. Department of Sociology & Anthropology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
Abstract
Female eligibility policies punish people for gender nonconformity and normalize patriarchal rule. These policies were used first to exclude women deemed “too masculine” from competing against women who more closely conform to gender stereotypes. In recent years, this form of discipline has dovetailed with efforts to determine the circumstances, if any, under which transgender women may compete against cisgender women. Modern sport, as a set of institutions, does not stand apart from capitalism, colonialism, white supremacy, and heteropatriarchy. In this article, I use a prison abolitionist lens to connect anti-trans campaigns and female eligibility policies that police sporting identity to the carceral logics of racial capitalism to make the argument that sex surveillance is related to race, social control, and capital accumulation.
Reference115 articles.
1. The role of socializing agents on dropout and continuing participation of adolescent girls in masculine-typed sports;Abadi, E.,2020
2. The problem with sex segregated sport;Adjepong, A,2022
3. State of exception;Agamben, G.,2004
4. Thinking with trans now;Aizura, A.Z.,2020
5. TERFs, gender-critical movements, and postfascist feminisms;Bassi, S.,2022