Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the German Version of the Upper Limb Functional Index

Author:

Ortega-Castillo Miguel12ORCID,Cuesta-Vargas Antonio123ORCID,Melloh Markus4ORCID,Trinidad-Fernández Manuel12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physiotherapy, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain

2. Clinimetria Research Group F-14, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain

3. School of Clinical Science, Faculty of Health Science, Queensland University Technology, Brisbane, Australia

4. Wellington Faculty of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

Abstract

Context: The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is a popular tool with valid psychometric properties to assess upper limb function in patients with musculoskeletal conditions. The aim of the study was to cross-culturally adapt and validate the German version of the ULFI. Design: Cross-cultural validation. Methods: A 2-stage cross-cultural adaptation of the ULFI was performed according to international guidelines through consecutive forward and backward translations. Psychometric properties of internal consistency, test–retest reliability, criterion, face and content validity, and factor structure were determined from the included German participants suffering from upper limb conditions (n = 100), who fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (1) older than 18 years old, (2) German as native language, and (3) medical diagnosis of musculoskeletal upper limb condition. Participants completed the ULFI; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; EuroQol Health Questionnaire 5 Dimensions; and Short Form-12 questionnaires. Results: The ULFI-G showed good internal consistency (α = .88); excellent test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient2:1 = .98); directly strong correlation with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (r = .84); fair correlation with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand-sport (r = .54); inversely fair correlation with EuroQol Health Questionnaire 5 Dimensions (r = −.62); and Short Form 12’s physical health domain (r = −.7). A single-factor structure was revealed. Conclusions: The ULFI-G showed adequate psychometric properties and proved to be a valid tool for upper limb functional assessment in German population.

Publisher

Human Kinetics

Reference38 articles.

1. The regulation of patient-reported outcome claims: need for a flexible standard;Morris LA,2002

2. Measures of health-related quality of life and physical function;Beaton DE,2003

3. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity;Beaton DE,2001

4. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires;Terwee CB,2007

5. Examination of the factor structure of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire;Lehman LA,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3