Caffeine Abstinence in Habituated Users: Cardiovascular Responses to Exercise With Blood Flow Restriction

Author:

Chatlaong Matthew A.1ORCID,Carter Daphney M.2ORCID,Miller William M.3ORCID,Davidson Chance J.1,Jessee Matthew B.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Applied Human Health and Physical Function Laboratory, Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA

2. Department of Exercise Science and Sport Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, USA

3. School of Health Sciences, University of Evansville, Evansville, IN, USA

Abstract

Context: Blood flow restriction resistance exercise studies often require caffeine abstinence to avoid cardiovascular effects that could change the blood flow restriction stimulus. However, effects may be attenuated for habituated users. Objective: To compare cardiovascular responses to blood flow restriction resistance exercise when habituated users consume or abstain from caffeine. Design: Thirty participants completed a 3-visit within-subject study beginning with familiarization and caffeine intake questionnaire. Methods: Visits 2 and 3 consisted of blood flow restriction resistance exercise (3 sets bicep curls to failure, 30% 1-repetition max, 40% arterial occlusion pressure [AOP]), following participants’ normal caffeine consumption (CAFF) or abstaining (ABS). AOP, systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure, and heart rate were measured preexercise and postexercise. Prevalues and preexercise to postexercise change scores for SBP, DBP, AOP (all millimeters of mercury), heart rate (in beats per minute), and repetitions were compared between conditions. Results are represented as mean (SD). Results: Preexercise AOP was similar for CAFF (137.8 [14.4]) and ABS (137.1 [14.9], BF10 = 0.2), although pre-SBP was higher for CAFF (115.4 [9.8]) than ABS (112.3 [9.4], BF10 = 1.9). Pre-DBP was similar between conditions. The exercise-induced change in AOP was greater for CAFF (18.4 [11.2]) than ABS (13.2 [14.9]), though evidence was anecdotal (BF10 = 0.7). Exercise-induced changes in SBP, DBP, and heart rate were similar between conditions (all BF10 ≤ 0.40). More repetitions were completed for CAFF (63 [26]) than ABS (57 [17], BF10 = 2.1). Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that for habituated users, maintaining daily caffeine habits will not have substantial effects on common cardiovascular variables relevant to blood flow restriction.

Publisher

Human Kinetics

Reference35 articles.

1. Blood flow restriction training: a novel approach to augment clinical rehabilitation: how to do it;Patterson SD,2017

2. Blood flow restriction exercise: considerations of methodology, application, and safety;Patterson SD,2019

3. Muscle adaptations to high-load training and very low-load training with and without blood flow restriction;Jessee MB,2018

4. Effects of blood flow restriction therapy for muscular strength, hypertrophy, and endurance in healthy and special populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Perera E,2022

5. Effects of low-intensity cycle training with restricted leg blood flow on thigh muscle volume and VO2max in young men;Abe T,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3