Minimal Number of Events Required for Acceleration–Speed Profiling in Elite Women’s Soccer

Author:

Cormier Patrick123ORCID,Tsai Ming-Chang1ORCID,Meylan Cesar134,Soares Victor H.T.5,Clarke David C.167,Klimstra Marc12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Canadian Sport Institute Pacific, Victoria, BC, Canada

2. School of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada

3. Health and Athletic Performance Department, Canada Soccer, Ottawa, ON, Canada

4. School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

5. Laboratory of Alternative Energy Conversion, Simon Fraser University, Surrey, BC, Canada

6. Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada

7. SFU Sports Analytics Group, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the minimum number of events (training or matches) for producing valid acceleration–speed (AS) profiles from global navigation satellite system (GNSS) data. Methods: Nine elite female soccer players participated in a 4-week training camp consisting of 19 events. AS profile metrics calculated from different combinations of athlete events were compared to force–velocity (FV) profile metrics from 2 × 40-m stand-alone sprint effort trials, using the same GNSS 10-Hz technology. Force–velocity profiles were calculated, from which AS profiles were obtained. AS profiles from training and matches were generated by plotting acceleration and speed points and performing a regression through the maximal points to obtain the AS metrics (theoretical maximal speed, x-intercept [in meters per second], theoretical maximal acceleration, y-intercept [in meters per second squared], and the slope per second). A linear mixed model was performed with the AS metrics as the outcome variables, the number of events as a fixed effect, and the participant identifier as a mixed effect. Dunnett post hoc multiple comparisons were used to compare the means of each number of event grouping (1–19 events) to those estimated from the dedicated sprint test. Results: Theoretical maximal speed and theoretical maximal acceleration means were no longer significantly different from the isolated sprint reference with 9 to 19 (small to trivial differences = −0.31 to −0.04 m·s−1, P = .12–.99) and 6 to 19 (small differences = −0.4 to −0.28 m·s−2, P = .06–.79) events, and the slopes were no longer different with 1 to 19 events (trivial differences = 0.06–0.03 s−1, P = .35–.99). Conclusions: AS profiles can be estimated from a minimum of 9 days of tracking data. Future research should investigate methodology resulting in AS profiles estimated from fewer events.

Publisher

Human Kinetics

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference15 articles.

1. Individual acceleration-speed profile in-situ: a proof of concept in professional football players;Morin JB,2021

2. A simple method for measuring power, force, velocity properties, and mechanical effectiveness in sprint running;Samozino P,2016

3. A simple method for computing sprint acceleration kinetics from running velocity data: replication study with improved design;Morin JB,2019

4. Comparison of acceleration-speed profiles from training and competition to individual maximal sprint efforts;Cormier P,2023

5. Reliability of individual acceleration-speed profile in-situ in elite youth soccer players;Clavel P,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3