Effects of Velocity Loss During Bench-Press Training With Light Relative Loads

Author:

Rodiles-Guerrero Luis12ORCID,Sánchez-Valdepeñas Juan23ORCID,Cornejo-Daza Pedro Jesús123ORCID,Páez-Maldonado José24ORCID,Cano-Castillo Clara1,Bachero-Mena Beatriz12ORCID,Sánchez-Moreno Miguel25ORCID,Pareja-Blanco Fernando23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Human Movement and Sport Performance, University of Seville, Seville, Spain

2. Science-Based Training Research Group, Department of Sports and Computer Sciences, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain

3. Department of Sports and Computer Sciences, Physical Performance and Sports Research Center, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain

4. University of Osuna (center attached to the University of Seville), Osuna, Spain

5. Department of Physical Education and Sports, University of Seville, Seville, Spain

Abstract

Purpose: This study explored the effects of 4 bench-press (BP) training programs with different velocity-loss (VL) thresholds (0%, 15%, 25%, and 50%) on strength gains and neuromuscular adaptations. Methods: Forty-six resistance-trained men (22.8 [4.4] y) were randomly assigned into 4 groups that differed in the VL allowed within the set: 0% (VL0), 15% (VL15), 25% (VL25), and 50% (VL50). Training loads (40%–55% 1-repetition maximum), frequency (2 sessions/wk), number of sets (3), and interset recovery (4 min) were identical for all groups. Participants completed the following tests before and after an 8-week (16-session) BP training program: (1) maximal isometric test, (2) progressive loading test, and (3) fatigue test in the BP exercise. During all tests, triceps brachii muscle electromyography was assessed. Results: After completing the resistance-training program, no significant group × time interactions were noticed for isometric and dynamic BP strength variables. The dose–response relationship exhibited an inverted U-shaped relationship pattern, with VL25 showing the greatest effect sizes for almost all strength variables analyzed. The total number of repetitions performed during the training program increased as the VL magnitude increased. Conclusions: The group that trained with high VL threshold (50%), which performed a total of 876 repetitions, did not experience additional strength gains compared with those experienced by the 0%, 15%, and 25% of VL groups, which performed significantly fewer repetitions (48, 357, and 547, respectively). These findings suggest that when light loads (40%–55% 1-repetition maximum) are used, low and moderate VL thresholds (0%–25%) provide a higher training efficiency.

Publisher

Human Kinetics

Reference30 articles.

1. The importance of muscular strength: training considerations;Suchomel TJ,2018

2. Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription;Kraemer WJ,2004

3. Dose–response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Schoenfeld B,2016

4. Designing resistance training programmes to enhance muscular fitness: a review of the acute programme variables;Bird SP,2005

5. Movement velocity as a measure of loading intensity in resistance training;González-Badillo JJ,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3