Objective Measures of Strain and Subjective Muscle Soreness Differ Between Positional Groups and Season Phases in American College Football

Author:

McKay Benjamin A.12ORCID,Delaney Jace A.3,Simpkin Andrew4ORCID,Larkin Theresa15ORCID,Murray Andrew6,Daniels Diarmuid7,Pedlar Charles R.789ORCID,Sampson John A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre of Medical and Exercise Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia

2. Athletics Department, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA

3. Boston Celtics, Boston, MA, USA

4. School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

5. Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, NSW, Australia

6. Physical Education & Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

7. Orreco Ltd, Business Innovation Unit, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

8. Faculty of Sport, Allied Health and Performance Sciences, St Mary’s University, London, United Kingdom

9. Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Purpose: To assess objective strain and subjective muscle soreness in “Bigs” (offensive and defensive line), “Combos” (tight ends, quarterbacks, line backers, and running backs), and “Skills” (wide receivers and defensive backs) in American college football players during off-season, fall camp, and in-season phases. Methods: Twenty-three male players were assessed once weekly (3-wk off-season, 4-wk fall camp, and 3-wk in-season) for hydroperoxides (free oxygen radical test [FORT]), antioxidant capacity (free oxygen radical defense test [FORD]), oxidative stress index (OSI), countermovement-jump flight time, Reactive Strength Index (RSI) modified, and subjective soreness. Linear mixed models analyzed the effect of a 2-within-subject-SD change between predictor and dependent variables. Results: Compared to fall camp and in-season phases, off-season FORT (P ≤ .001 and <.001), FORD (P ≤ .001 and <.001), OSI (P ≤ .001 and <.001), flight time (P ≤ .001 and <.001), RSI modified (P ≤ .001 and <.001), and soreness (P ≤ .001 and <.001) were higher for “Bigs,” whereas FORT (P ≤ .001 and <.001) and OSI (P = .02 and <.001) were lower for “Combos.” FORT was higher for “Bigs” compared to “Combos” in all phases (P ≤ .001, .02, and .01). FORD was higher for “Skills” compared with “Bigs” in off-season (P = .02) and “Combos” in-season (P = .01). OSI was higher for “Bigs” compared with “Combos” (P ≤ .001) and “Skills” (P = .01) during off-season and to “Combos” in-season (P ≤ .001). Flight time was higher for “Skills” in fall camp compared with “Bigs” (P = .04) and to “Combos” in-season (P = .01). RSI modified was higher for “Skills” during off-season compared with “Bigs” (P = .02) and “Combos” during fall camp (P = .03), and in-season (P = .03). Conclusion: Off-season American college football training resulted in higher objective strain and subjective muscle soreness in “Bigs” compared with fall camp and during in-season compared with “Combos” and “Skills” players.

Publisher

Human Kinetics

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference39 articles.

1. Body composition and bone mineral density of division 1 collegiate football players, a consortium of college athlete research (C-CAR) study;Bosch TA,2019

2. Quantification of competitive game demands of NCAA division I college football players using global positioning systems;Wellman AD,2016

3. Movement demands and perceived wellness associated with preseason training camp in NCAA division I college football players;Wellman AD,2017

4. Quantification of accelerometer derived impacts associated with competitive games in NCAA division I college football players;Wellman AD,2016

5. Use of relative speed zones increases the high-speed running performed in team sport match play;Gabbett TJ,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3