Effects of 4 Different Velocity-Based Resistance-Training Programming Models on Physical Performance

Author:

Riscart-López Javier12ORCID,Sánchez-Valdepeñas Juan13ORCID,Mora-Vela Raúl3ORCID,Caro-Ávalos Javier3ORCID,Sánchez-González Lidia3,Sánchez-Moreno Miguel34ORCID,León-Prados Juan Antonio13ORCID,Pareja-Blanco Fernando13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain

2. Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Cádiz, Puerto Real, Spain

3. Physical Performance and Sports Research Center, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain

4. Department of Physical Education and Sports, University of Seville, Seville, Spain

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the effects of 4 programming models (linear [LP], undulating [UP], reverse [RP], and constant [CP]) on physical performance. Methods: Forty-eight moderately strength-trained men were randomly assigned to LP, UP, RP, and CP groups according to their 1-repetition maximum (1RM) in the full-squat exercise (SQ) and followed an 8-week training intervention using the SQ and monitoring movement velocity for every repetition. All groups trained with similar mean relative intensity (65% 1RM), number of repetitions (240), sets (3), and interset recovery (4 min) throughout the training program. Pretraining and posttraining measurements included, in the SQ, 1RM load, the average velocity attained for all absolute loads common to pretests and posttests (AV), and the average velocity for loads that were moved faster (AV > 1) and slower (AV < 1) than 1 m·s−1 at pretraining tests. Moreover, countermovement jump height and 20-m running sprint time were measured. Results: A significant time effect was found for all variables analyzed (P < .05), except for 20-m running sprint time. Significant group × time interactions were observed for 1RM, AV > 1, and AV (P < .05). After training, all groups attained significant strength gains on 1RM, AV, AV > 1, and AV < 1 (P < .001–.01). LP and RP groups improved their countermovement jump height (P < .01), but no significant changes were observed for UP and CP. No significant improvements were achieved in 20-m running sprint time for any groups. Conclusions: These different programming models are all suitable for improving physical performance. LP and RP induce similar or greater gains in physical performance than UP and CP.

Publisher

Human Kinetics

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference35 articles.

1. Effects of periodization on strength and muscle hypertrophy in volume-equated resistance training programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Moesgaard L,2016

2. The general adaptation syndrome: a foundation for the concept of periodization;Cunanan AJ,2018

3. Block periodization versus traditional training theory: a review;Issurin VB,2008

4. A comparison of periodization models during nine weeks with equated volume and intensity for strength;Buford TW,2007

5. A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for strength;Rhea MR,2002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3