Evolution of 1500-m Olympic Running Performance

Author:

Foster Carl1,Hanley Brian2ORCID,Barroso Renato3,Boullosa Daniel4ORCID,Casado Arturo5,Haugen Thomas6,Hettinga Florentina J.7ORCID,Jones Andrew M.8,Renfree Andrew9,Skiba Philip810,St Clair Gibson Alan11,Thiel Christian12,de Koning Jos J.13

Affiliation:

1. University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI, USA

2. Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK

3. University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil

4. Universidad de León, Madrid, Spain

5. Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain

6. Kristiania University College, Oslo, Norway

7. University of Northumbria, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

8. University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

9. University of Worcester, Worcester, UK

10. Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL, USA

11. University of Hull, Hull, UK

12. Hochschule für Gesundheit Bochum, Bochum, Germany

13. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Abstract

Purpose: This study determined the evolution of performance and pacing for each winner of the men’s Olympic 1500-m running track final from 1924 to 2020. Methods: Data were obtained from publicly available sources. When official splits were unavailable, times from sources such as YouTube were included and interpolated from video records. Final times, lap splits, and position in the peloton were included. The data are presented relative to 0 to 400 m, 400 to 800 m, 800 to 1200 m, and 1200 to 1500 m. Critical speed and D′ were calculated using athletes’ season’s best times. Results: Performance improved ∼25 seconds from 1924 to 2020, with most improvement (∼19 s) occurring in the first 10 finals. However, only 2 performances were world records, and only one runner won the event twice. Pacing evolved from a fast start–slow middle–fast finish pattern (reverse J-shaped) to a slower start with steady acceleration in the second half (J-shaped). The coefficient of variation for lap speeds ranged from 1.4% to 15.3%, consistent with a highly tactical pacing pattern. With few exceptions, the eventual winners were near the front throughout, although rarely in the leading position. There is evidence of a general increase in both critical speed and D′ that parallels performance. Conclusions: An evolution in the pacing pattern occurred across several “eras” in the history of Olympic 1500-m racing, consistent with better trained athletes and improved technology. There has been a consistent tactical approach of following opponents until the latter stages, and athletes should develop tactical flexibility, related to their critical speed and D′, in planning prerace strategy.

Publisher

Human Kinetics

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference38 articles.

1. Competition between desired competitive result, tolerable homeostatic disturbance, and psychophysiological interpretation determines pacing strategy;Foster C,2023

2. Effect of competitive distance on energy expenditure during simulated competition;Foster C,2004

3. Perception of fatigue during simulated competition;Joseph T,2008

4. Pacing strategy in short cycling time trials;de Jong J,2015

5. Using modeling to understand how athletes in different disciplines solve the same problem: swimming versus running versus speed skating;de Koning JJ,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3