DOES FINTECH CHANGE THE MARKET POWER OF TRADITIONAL BANKS IN CHINA?

Author:

Qi Hanying1ORCID,Yang Keng2,Wang Weijia3

Affiliation:

1. The New Type Key Think Tank of Zhejiang Province’s “Research Institute of Regulation and Public Policy”, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou, China; China Institute of Regulation Research, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou, China

2. Institute of Economics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China; One Belt-One Road Strategy Institute, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

3. Tailong Finance School, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China

Abstract

This study assesses the impact of the development of financial technology (FinTech) on the market power of traditional banks. We analyze the relationship between FinTech companies and traditional banks based on the barriers-to-entry theory, and verify the resulting hypothesis by using panel data from 155 Chinese commercial banks from 2013–2018. The benchmark results show that FinTech has a significant U-shaped effect on the market power of banks. Furthermore, the U-shaped effects remain robust when we focus on the technology and business innovation channels that affect banks. These effects vary across banks with different ownership structures and business segments. Specifically, municipal commercial banks are more likely to be influenced by business innovation than by technological innovation. By contrast, state-owned banks have advantages in using technological innovation to reacquire market power through loan services. Private banks, meanwhile, struggle to acquire any market power under intense competition from FinTech companies. Given that the FinTech may enable some banks overly dominate the banking industry at certain development stages, regulators and practitioners need to prevent monopoly-related problems and promote the digital transformation of small and medium-sized banks.

Publisher

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference65 articles.

1. Abdeldayem, M. M., & Aldulaimi, S. (2020). Trends of global Fintech education practices and the GCC perspective. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(03), 7150-7163. http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/7577

2. Agarwal, S., Ghosh P., Alok, S., & Gupta, S. (2019). Fintech and credit scoring for the millennial generation [Conference presentation]. Annual Conference. Asian Bureau of Finance and Economic Research.

3. Barriers to Bank Entry

4. FinTech and the transformation of the financial industry

5. Whom do consumers trust with their data? US survey evidence;Armantier, O.;BIS Bulletin,2021

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The impact of bank FinTech on commercial banks' risk-taking in China;International Review of Financial Analysis;2023-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3