Affiliation:
1. Laboratory of Geotechnics, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania
2. CSD Engineers, Vilnius, Lithuania
Abstract
Pile group foundations are widely employed in geotechnical design. Bearing capacity increment/reduction of
pile group (PG) foundation in design practice often described via empirical efficiency factor (EF), a multiplier to sum
of single piles (SP) resistances, when they act isolated. The magnitude of EF depends on spacing of SP in PG, soil
parameters, configuration of piles, friction of soil-pile, etc. Proposed predictions for choosing the EF magnitude are
contradictory. The tests of displacement SP and PG tests conducted in laboratory conditions for 2 spacing cases, ground
stress-strain evolution of PG analyzed. The EF magnitude reproduced from tests results compared with proposed by
different authors predictions. The pronounced effect of installation sequence to displacement SP response measures,
when acting in PG estimated during the tests. From practical point, this phenomenon if ignored for certain connection
case of superstructure with PG cap and that of SP with PG cap may cause unexpected PG foundation movements,
subsequently resulting the additional stressing of superstructure and foundation. SP installation effect for displacement
PG foundation measures of ground response should be properly evaluated in design of constructional elements of superstructure and foundation.
Publisher
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Reference16 articles.
1. Finite element study of the influence of pile jetting on load capacity of adjacent piles
2. Numerical assessment of axial pile group response based on load test
3. European Committee for Standardization. (2004). Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design – Part 1: General rules (EN 1997 – 1:2004). Retrieved from https://www.ngm2016.com/uploads/2/1/7/9/21790806/eurocode_7_-_geotechnical_designen.1997.1.2004.pdf
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献