Affiliation:
1. Department of Business, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Abstract
This paper uses the case of Spain to investigate whether and how disruptive technology impacts banking stock returns under a high volatility regime and a low volatility regime. For this purpose, a two-factor model with heteroscedastic Markov switching regimes has been applied. The results indicate that disruptive technologies have an impact on Spanish banking stock returns and that the effects are volatility regime dependent, having a relevant positive impact in high volatility regimes and a less relevant negative impact in low volatility regimes. These findings suggest that investors are informed about and acknowledge the advantages of disruptive technologies and will use their adoption as a business strategy to offset adverse market circumstances. During stable market conditions, on the other hand, Spanish banking seems to have less expectations about disruptive technology as a business strategy. To summarise, this paper provides insights into the role of the pricing of banking-related assets and has other relevant implications for investors that include disruptive technology or banking exposed investments in their portfolios.
Publisher
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Reference104 articles.
1. Abdymomunov, A., & Morley, J. (2011). Time variation of CAPM betas across market volatility regimes. Applied Financial Economics, 21(19), 1463-1478. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2011.577010
2. Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on information, bn petrow, f. Czaki, Akademiai Kiado. Budapest.
3. Andersson, K., & Styf, A. (2020). Blockchain technology & volatility of stock returns: a quantitative study that examines blockchain technology's impact on volatility in Swedish stock (Master Thesis). Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?dswid=9035&pid=diva2%3A1445361
4. Ang, A., & Bekaert, G. (2004). How regimes affect asset al.ocation. Financial Analysts Journal, 60(2), 86-99. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v60.n2.2612
5. Ang, A., & Timmermann, A. (2012). Regime changes and financial markets. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 4(1), 313-337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-110311-101808