THE IMPACT OF INSTITUTIONS ON INNOVATION NETWORKS: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM POLAND

Author:

Godlewska Małgorzata1ORCID,Banasik Przemysław2ORCID,Morawska Sylwia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Administrative and Financial Corporate Law, SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland

2. Department of Entrepreneurship, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland

Abstract

Innovation networks may accelerate and improve the innovation process, while institutional pathologies may hamper it. This study employs the Kruskal-Wallis H test and regression analysis to determine if the relationship between institutions and innovation networks does exist among the investigated variables. The purpose of the study was to find out whether cooperation with special local institutions influences the innovative behaviour of local governments manifested by participation in innovation networks or innovation networks based on formal institutions limit institutional pathologies better than informal ones. Current paper presents results of an empirical study conducted through survey among all local governments in Poland. The findings show that previous cooperation with special local institutions influences the innovation behaviour of local governments or innovation networks based on formal rules limit the institutional pathologies of innovation networks better than those based on sanctions, common values, codes of ethics, governance codes or culture. The investigated problem is significant, as properly functioning innovation networks may generate incremental innovations, which may help to solve the contemporary challenges. The practical implications for national regulatory bodies highlight the need for an enforcement mechanism which may support the formalisation of innovation networks.

Publisher

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University

Subject

Finance

Reference81 articles.

1. Innovation Networks

2. Individual connectedness in innovation networks: On the role of individual motivation

3. Local Government and Governance in Norway: Stretched Accountability in Network Politics

4. Abbasi, F., Motavasseli, M., Zali, M. R., Faghih, N., & Meigounpoory, M. R. (2019). How does the technological innovation come from? A multilevel framework. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 10(4), 527-550. https://doi.org/10.14456/ITJEMAST.2019.50

5. Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3