ROBOTIC THEATRE: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HUMAN AND MECHANIZED ACTIVITIES IN THE CREATIVE PROCESS-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

ROBOTIC THEATRE: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HUMAN AND MECHANIZED ACTIVITIES IN THE CREATIVE PROCESS

Published:2021-08-09 Issue:2 Volume:14 Page:295-306
ISSN:2345-0479
Container-title:Creativity Studies
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Sovhyra Tetiana¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Variety Art Department, Faculty of Variety Art Directing, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts, Konovalets str. 36, 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine

Abstract

The article systematizes and analyzes the existing experience of organizing the creative process in a robotic theater. The author explores the robotic theater phenomenon, the artificial intelligence technology possibilities to function in the stage space. The article provides a comparative analysis of human and mechanized interaction in the stage space. The methodological basis of the research is a combination of several methods: analytical – for accounting for historical and fictional literature; theoretical and conceptual method – for analyzing the conceptual and terminological system of research and identifying the specifics of introducing the artificial intelligence technology in creative process; comparative-typological – to compare the peculiarities of the functioning of mechanized “actors” with the acting skills of human performers. The article explores the threat perception and uncanny valley concepts to study the perception of a robot–actor by an audience. The author examines the process of human interaction with a robotic body: from the moment of interest, interaction to the moment of rejection of the robot by a person (audience).

Publisher

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,Cultural Studies

Reference36 articles.

1. Abbott, A. E. (1992). Flatland: A romance of many dimensions. In Ph. Smith (Ed.), Dover thrift editions. S. Appelbaum (General Ed.). Dover Publications, Inc.

2. Bruce, A., Knight, J., Listopad, S., Magerko, B., & Nourbakhsh, I. R. (2000, 24–28 April). Robot improv: using drama to create believable agents. In Proceedings 2000 ICRA, Millennium Conference. International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065) (pp. 4002–4008). San Francisco, California, United States. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

3. Does the uncanny valley exist? An empirical test of the relationship between eeriness and the human likeness of digitally created faces

4. Colton, S., & Wiggins, G. A. (2012, 27–31 August). Computational creativity: the final frontier? In L. De Raedt, Ch. Bessiere, D. Dubois, P. Doherty, & P. Frasconi (Eds.), ECAI’12: Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 21–26). Montpellier, France. IOS Press

5. Blurring Human–Machine Distinctions: Anthropomorphic Appearance in Social Robots as a Threat to Human Distinctiveness