SELF-ASSESSMENT TO SUBJECTIVE CREATIVITY AND NEW IDEAS: DETERMINANT WITHIN RISK TAKING, AUTONOMY AND TRADITION

Author:

Ngọc Trung Nguyễn1ORCID,Thị Hoai Le Nguyễn1ORCID,Viết Hồi Trần2ORCID,Kim Won Joong3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Human Development and Human Resource Studies, Institute of Human Studies, Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences, No. 9 Kim Ma Thuong str., Ba Dinh, Ha Noi-Vietnam 100000, Hanoi, Vietnam

2. Center for Enterprise Partnership, Hanoi University of Industry, No. 298 Cau Dien str., Bac Tu Liem, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam

3. Department of Economics, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-Gu, Seoul 05029, South Korea

Abstract

Individuals’ creativity and new ideas today are not only essential for firms, agencies or organizations but also indispensable even for a nation. This article analyzes impacts of autonomy, risk taking and, especially, factor of tradition on self-assessment to subjective creativity and attitude to new ideas. Specifically, the article empirically analyzes how those factors affect creativity and new ideas and tests whether tradition is more meaningful than others in explaining creativity or new ideas. Most of previous research has theoretically concluded that, because of rigid and unchangeable norms and rules in tradition, individuals are not easy to generate or do new things, especially in Eastern countries. South Korea, with a long tradition within Asian and Confucian values, it is said that these values may limit creativity and new ideas. However, South Korea has achieved satisfactory outcomes in process of creative development, which could positively be affected by its tradition. Using the data from World Values Survey for South Korea at the latest wave 6th, the results show that tradition has a positive impact on subjective creativity beside significantly positive influence of risk taking, which is not considered to be important from cultural perspective.

Publisher

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,Cultural Studies

Reference32 articles.

1. Amabile, T. M. (2000). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & R. I. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 22 (pp. 123–167). Elsevier Science, Inc.

2. Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1998/09/howto-kill-creativity

3. ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY.

4. Celso Furtado: Culture and Creativity Matter

5. Fostering Creativity and Innovation without Encouraging Unethical Behavior

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3