EVALUATION OF TWO-LANE ROAD SECTIONS IN TERMS OF TRAFFIC RISK USING AN INTEGRATED MCDM MODEL

Author:

Stević Željko1,Subotić Marko1,Tanackov Ilija2,Sremac Siniša2,Ristić Bojana1,Simić Sanja1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering in Doboj, University of East Sarajevo, Doboj, Bosnia and Herzegovina

2. Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

Abstract

The impact of geometric characteristics on traffic risk is reflected through identifying conflict points on roads,traffic accidents, and any other unforeseen situation that is inherently hazardous for traffic participants. In order to identify the road sections with the highest risk, it is necessary to consider a number of criteria that affect risk, and conduct extensive empirical research, analysis and data synthesis. This paper evaluates 9 sections of two-lane roads in the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina (the Republic of Srpska) using an integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) model.To determine the significance of 8 criteria for the evaluation of the sections, it was applied a subjective–objective model consisting of 3 methods: (1) CRiteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC), (2) FUll COnsistency Method (FUCOM) and (3) fuzzy PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIPRECIA). The aggregation of the criterion values obtained using the methods yielded the final criterion values. Measurement Alternatives and Ranking according to COmpromise Solution (MARCOS) method was used to evaluate the sections and determine their objective diversity. The obtained results identified one location as extremely hazardous by most of analysed input parameters. The section with the highest risk is the Rudanka – Doboj section (A4), which represents a section of the road infrastructure of the 105 road. The validation of the results obtained by applying the integrated MCDM model was performed through an extensive sensitivity analysis. The weights of criteria were observed through initially individual methods implemented in the MARCOS method. Then, a comparative analysis was performed with 6 other MCDM methods and Spearman’s Correlation Coefficient (SCC) was calculated as a statistical indicator of rank correlation in a sensitivity analysis. In addition,the Standard Deviation (STDEV) of the obtained results was determined.

Publisher

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Automotive Engineering

Reference59 articles.

1. AASHTO. 2010. Highway Safety Manual. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington, DC, US.

2. An application of WASPAS method in risk qualitative analysis: a case study of a road construction project in Iran

3. Ranking the Libyan airlines by using full consistency method (FUCOM) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP);Badi, I.;Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications,2019

4. Ranking conceptual locations for a park-and-ride parking lot using EDAS method

5. Baruya, A. 1998. Speed-accident relationships on European roads, in 9th International Conference on Road Safety in Europe, 21-23 September 1998, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany. 19 p.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3