Investigation of acoustic agglomeration efficiency using different working conditions of acoustic chamber
Author:
KILIKEVIČIENĖ Kristina1ORCID, CHLEBNIKOVAS Aleksandras1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Research Institute of Mechanical Science, Faculty of Mechanics, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, J. Basanavičiaus g. 28, Vilnius, Lithuania
Abstract
Particulate matter pollution is one of the main factors of atmospheric pollution. Due to its negative impact
on both human health and the environment, it has become an actual problem in Lithuania and around the world. This
paper will present a method for reducing the concentration of ultrafine particulate matter present in the atmosphere
and causing pollution using different parameters of the acoustic chamber. Fine particles with an aerodynamic diameter
of less than 2.5 μm are usually more saturated with toxic heavy metals and other pollutants due to their large surface
area and strong surface activity. These particles go deep into the lungs and can cause lung cancer and other heart and
lung diseases. Acoustic agglomeration is one of the most promising pretreatment technologies. Before using traditional
particulate removal technologies, the ultrafine particles in the exhaust gas are exposed to a high-intensity sound wave,
which promotes the relative motion of the aerosol particles and increases their agglomeration rate. Given results approved
the high effect of reducing the amount of ultrafine particulate matter by agglomeration, thus, the reducing of
the finest 0.3 μm particles is equal to more than half time at frequency of 34.75 kHz, 0.5 μm – more than half and more
than three times at both frequencies of 20.06 kHz and 34.75 kHz respectively.
Reference24 articles.
1. Abbas, I., Badran, G., Verdin, A., Ledoux, F., Roumie, M., Lo Guidice, J.-M., Courcot, D., & Garçon, G. (2019). In vitro evaluation of organic extractable matter from ambient PM2.5 using human bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B cells: Cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory response, genotoxicity, and cell cycle deregulation. Environmental Research, 171, 510-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.052 2. Agarwal, A., Gupta, T., Dixit, N., & Shukla, P. (2013). Assessment of toxic potential of primary and secondary particulates/aerosols from biodiesel vis-à-vis mineral diesel fuelled engine. Inhalation Toxicology, 25(6), 325-332. https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2013.782515 3. Amiri, M., Sadighzadeh, A., & Falamaki, C. (2016). Experimental parametric study of frequency and sound pressure level on the acoustic coagulation and precipitation of PM2.5 aerosols. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 16(12), 3012-3025. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.12.0683 4. Bi, X., Feng, Y., Wu, J., Wang, Y., & Zhu, T. (2007). Source apportionment of PM10 in six cities of northern China. Atmospheric Environment, 41(5), 903-912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.09.033 5. Dass, A., Srivastava, S., & Chaudhary, G. (2021). Air pollution: A review and analysis using fuzzy techniques in Indian scenario. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 22, 101441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101441
|
|