Multi-criteria evaluation of masonry facade installation by saving resources and limiting waste-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Multi-criteria evaluation of masonry facade installation by saving resources and limiting waste

Published:2023-10-23 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:2029-7092
Container-title:The 12th International Conference ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING 12th ICEE SELECTED PAPERS
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

ZIGMUND Viačeslav¹^ORCID,ANTUCHEVIČIENĖ Jurgita¹^ORCID,MIGILINSKAS Darius¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, Vilnius, Lithuania

Abstract

The aim of the study is to offer a new sustainable method for production and installation of masonry facade. The paper presents a case study of facade reconstruction and aims to evaluate three masonry facade alternatives according to multiple criteria, focusing on saving resources and limiting waste. Building Information Model was prepared for precise quantity surveying and management. The Entropy method was applied to determine the relative weights of criteria, and alternatives were evaluated and ranked by applying the CoCoSo (Combined Compromise Solution) method. Prefabricated tension masonry panels were found to be the best sustainable way of masonry facade installation.

Publisher

VILNIUS TECH

Reference26 articles.

1. Akinade, O. O., Oyedele, L. O., Ajayi, S. O., Bilal, M., Alaka, H. A., Owolabi, H. A., & Arawomo, O. O. (2018). Designing out construction waste using BIM technology: Stakeholders' expectations for industry deployment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 375-385https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.022

2. Banihashemi, S. A., Khalilzadeh, M., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2021). Investigating the environmental impacts of construction projects in time-cost trade-off project scheduling problems with CoCoSo multi-criteria decision-making method. Sustainability, 13(19), 10922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910922

3. Chen, C.-H. (2020). A novel multi-criteria decision-making model for building material supplier selection based on Entropy-AHP weighted TOPSIS. Entropy, 22(2), 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22020259

4. Cheng, B., Huang, J., Lu, K., Li, J., Gao, G., Wang, T., & Chen., H. (2022). BIM-enabled life cycle assessment of concrete formwork waste reduction through prefabrication. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 53, 102449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102449

5. Eldeep, A. M., Farag, M. A. M., & Abd El-hafez, L. M. (2022). Using BIM as a lean management tool in construction processes - A case study. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(2), 101556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.07.009