Diversity of land use restrictions impact on social life-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Diversity of land use restrictions impact on social life

Published:2023-10-23 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:2029-7092
Container-title:The 12th International Conference ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING 12th ICEE SELECTED PAPERS
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

PETRAKOVSKA Olga¹^ORCID,MYKHALOVA Mariia MYKHALOVA¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Land Management and Cadastre Department, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Povitroflotskyi ave. 31, 03037 Kyiv, Ukraine

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to investigate of diversity of land use restrictions and their impact on social life. The analysis and synthesis, comparison and system methods were used during this study. The following tasks are aimed to achieve the goal: to perform the analysis of land use restrictions diversity; to aggregate and structure the land use restrictions; categorize the land use restrictions; to research the impact of land use restrictions on social life. The classification of land use restrictions is proposed de-pends on different classification features. The results of the study illustrate the need for further determination of the assessment of the impact of restrictions on social life.

Publisher

VILNIUS TECH

Reference24 articles.

1. Barker, K. (2006, December 5). Barker Review of Land Use Planning: Final Report - Recommendations. HM Treasury. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228605/0118404857.pdf

2. Barrow, C. J. (2002). Evaluating the social impacts of environmental change and the environmental impacts of social change: An introductory review of social impact assessment. Environmental Studies, 59(2), 185-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207230210922

3. Burdge, R. J. (1990). Utilizing social impact assessment variables in the planning model. In SECTION 2: Models of integration: conceptual frameworks and administrative structures: Part 1: Conceptual frameworks, Impact Assessment Bulletin, 8(1/2), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/07349165.1990.9726030

4. Coad, L., Campbell, A., Miles, L., & Humphries, K. (2008, May 21). The costs and benefits of protected areas for local Livelihoods: a review of the current literature. Working Paper. UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, U.K. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/8482/Cost_benefits_protected_forests_area.pdf?sequence=3

5. ICSM Intergovernmental Committee on Surveying & Mapping. (n.d.). Cadastre 2034: Powering Land & Real Property. Cadastral Reform and Innovation for Australia - A National Strategy. https://www.icsm.gov.au/cadastre-2034