Generative tools of AI in education
Author:
Mironova Julija1ORCID, Riiascshenko Viktoria1ORCID, Bondarenko Andrey1ORCID, Kinderis Remigijus2ORCID, Verdenhofa Olga1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. ISMA University of Applied Sciences, Lomonosova street 1-6, LV-1019, Riga, Latvia 2. Klaipėda University of Applied Sciences, Jaunystes str.1, LT-91274, Klaipėda, Lithuania
Abstract
Since generative tools of Artificial Intelligence appeared in education, ongoing discussion arose. Still, higher education institutions argue if generative tools can be used, and if yes, what exactly can be accepted. The purpose of this study is to investigate for what exactly students use the generative tool Chat GPT in their studies, as well as to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between students representing different fields of study in terms of usage of Chat GPT in general, as well as in evaluation of the knowledge. The objectives of the study are to research recent scientific findings, as well as to analyze the results of the survey created by authors, which was distributed in Latvia, Lithuania, Ukraine, Bulgaria and Uzbekistan. Methods of the study are analysis of the recent findings and statistical analysis of the survey. To test hypotheses, the authors employed the Kruscal-Wallis non-parametric test for both hypotheses, where authors tested if there are statistically significant differences between answers of students from different education fields. The final results highlight the use of Chat GPT by students in higher education.
Publisher
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Reference24 articles.
1. AL-Smadi, M. (2023). ChatGPT and beyond: The generative AI revolution in education. Arxiv.org. https://ar5iv.org/abs/2311.15198 2. Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. W. W. Norton. 3. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D…, Wright, R. (2023). Opinion paper: "So what if ChatGPT wrote it?" Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational ai for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, Article 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642 4. Eapen, T. T., Finkenstadt, D. J., Folk, J., & Venkataswamy, L. (2023). How generative AI can augment human creativity: Use it to promote divergent thinking. Harvard Business review, 101(4), 56-64. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4759930 5. Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
|
|