Affiliation:
1. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Staff, College of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook University, 4811 Townsville, Australia
Abstract
Doctoral education is an increasingly prevalent part of the worldwide higher education landscape. Although there are variations in how programs are constructed and delivered, there is general agreement that evidence of creativity is expected in the final thesis. Despite the significant attention the supervisory process has received in the literature, students’ views on creativity as it applies to their candidature have not been extensively explored. This article reports on interviews with a sample of 12 current doctoral students in the areas of the arts, social sciences, and education from the theoretical perspective of the systems model of creativity. Interview participants were invited to reflect on the concept of creativity, and the factors which support or constrain their potential to be creative. The findings reveal that on reflection, students are able to identify the creative elements of their work, however the findings also indicate that creativity education should be given greater focus in doctoral programs, in order to embed this important concept and process to support students’ learning journey.
Publisher
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Reference28 articles.
1. Baptista, A., Frick, L., Holley, K., Remmik, M., Tesch, J., & Åkerlind, G. (2015). The doctorate as an original contribution to knowledge: Considering relationships between originality, creativity, and innovation. Frontline Learning Research, 3(3), 55-67.
2. Bengtsen, S. S. E. (2016). An exploration of darkness within doctoral education: Creative learning approaches of doctoral students. In Ch. Zhou (Ed.), Handbook of research on creative problem-solving skill development in higher education (pp. 260-282). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0643-0.ch012
3. Brodin, E. M. (2016). Critical and creative thinking nexus: Learning experiences of doctoral students. Studies in Higher Education, 41(6), 971-989. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.943656
4. Brodin, E. M. (2018). The stifling silence around scholarly creativity in doctoral education: Experiences of students and supervisors in four disciplines. Higher Education, 75, 655-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0168-3
5. Brodin, E., & Avery, H. (2014). Conditions for scholarly creativity in interdisciplinary doctoral education through an Aristotelian lens. In E. Shiu (Ed.), Creativity research: An inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary research handbook (pp. 273-294). Routledge.