Affiliation:
1. Department of Art Education, Faculty of Education, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey
Abstract
Creative thinking measurement for everyone in different domains is the most crucial critical subject. Therefore, the current discussion continues whether creativity in various fields different.This study aimed to measurement the students’ creative thinking scores in various domains disciplines to reveal differences. The main research question was as followed: Do whether students’creative thinking scores of students in art and non-art education differ significantly? The method was a causal-comparative research design. Participant students (N = 456, meanage = 16–21) were equivalent regarding some variations; as education disciplines and ages. While however, the art and non-art education students were the domain-specific was art education students, the and domaingeneral,was non-art education students respectively. The present study determined a significant difference between domain-specific and domain-general on creative thinking scores in favor of the non-art education students in the range of ages 16 to 21. The study concluded that alternative instruments with domain-specific content needed to measure individuals’ creative thinking in the domain-specific. This study suggested future research to conduct creativity measurement comparatively individuals in different age ranges and domains fields.
Publisher
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,Cultural Studies
Reference55 articles.
1. Acar, S., Abdulla Alabbasi, A. M., Runco, M. A., & Beketayev, K. (2019). Latency as a predictor of originality in divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100574
2. Aslan, E. (2001). Torrance Yaratıcı Düşünce Testi'nin Türkçe Versiyonu. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimler Dergisi, 14, 19-40.
3. Baer, J. (2016). Explorations in creativity research. Domain specificity of creativity. J. C. Kaufman (Series Ed.). Elsevier Inc.
4. Batey, M., Furnham, A., & Safiullina, X. (2010). Intelligence, general knowledge and personality as predictors of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 532-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.04.008
5. Blazhenkova, O., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2016). Types of creativity and visualization in teams of different educational specialization. Creativity Research Journal, 28(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1162638
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献