Affiliation:
1. Self-Development Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
Designing and implementing full-scale models by architecture students is one of the most difficult and uncommon experiences in design education. The study evaluates the impact of this experience on the development of creative design skills among first-year students. This is achieved by applying a methodology that combines quantitative analysis of learning outcomes, especially those associated with the skills of Basic Design courses, with qualitative analysis of sketches, scaled and full models, and video recordings of students during design and implementation stages. This study provides experimental support for the use of full-scale models in design education to develop students’ creative skills, in addition to discussing opportunities and challenges to help faculty and researchers in the field of design education.
Publisher
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,Cultural Studies
Reference33 articles.
1. Ayyıldız Potur, A., & Barkul, Ö. (2006, 16-18 March). Creative thinking in architectural design education. In Proceedings of 1st International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction Student Chapters Postgraduate Conference (pp. 113-125). Ankara, Turkey. Habitat International Coalition.
2. Brown, A. S. (2007). The creative impulse: You know it when you see it, but just what is that spark that changes things? Is it even a spark? And can a cross-functional team achieve it? Mechanical Engineering Magazine, 129(9), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2007-SEP-1
3. Canizaro, V. B. (2012). Design-build in architectural education: Motivations, practices, challenges, successes and failures. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 6(3), 20-36.
4. Chamel, O. (2016). Design/build: A relevant pedagogy for architecture education. VITRUVIO: International Journal of Architectural Technology and Sustainability, 1(2), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2016.6773
5. Charyton, Ch., Jagacinski, R. J., & Merrill, J. A. (2008). CEDA: A research instrument for creative engineering design assessment. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(3), 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.3.147
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献