COMPARATIVE STUDY IN THE PARADIGM OF ART RESEARCH AND ART CREATION

Author:

Sunarto Bambang1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Post Graduate School, Indonesian Institute of the Arts, Surakarta, Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara 19, 57126 Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia

Abstract

This article reveals the epistemology of the pillars of existence between art research and artistic creation. The main focus is to tell about the nature of the paradigm, especially the paradigm of research and artistic creation. This discussion is necessary because both have been present as art disciplines that have received wide attention in the academic world. This paper elaborates ideographically on the thoughts of researchers and artists comprehensively when researching and creating art. The aim is to improve epistemological literacy in learning the implementation of research and creating works of art with strong pillars of existence. Anyone concerned with research and art creation has significant potential to carry out academic tasks. Whoever they are, they need a pillar of existence as the basis for intellectual performance. This article describes the nature of the pillars of existence in art research activities and the nature of the pillars of existence in art creation activities. The elements of the two paradigms, the relationship between the pillars of existence, and the elements of the paradigm will receive great attention. This explanation has an important meaning, namely to foster regular reasoning in the development of the paradigm of researchers and art creators, as well as to stimulate the spirit to be accountable for their work academically for art researchers and creators.

Publisher

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,Cultural Studies

Reference49 articles.

1. Ahimsa-Putra, H. Sh. (2008). Paradigma dan revolusi ilmu dalam antropologi budaya - sketsa beberapa episode. Fakultas Ilmu Budaya UGM.

2. Ahimsa-Putra, H. Sh. (2007). Paradigma, Epistemologi dan Metode Ilmu Sosial-Budaya: Sebuah Pemetaan. Antropologi.

3. Andersen, H. O., & Koutnik, P. G. (1972). Toward more effective science instruction in secondary education. Macmillan Publishing Company, Inc.

4. Benjamin, A. C. (1950). Philosophy of the sciences. In V. Ferm (Ed.), A history of philosophical systems (pp. 540-551). Rider and Company.

5. Black, M. (2018). Critical thinking: An introduction to logic and scientific method. Muriwai Books.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3