THE ROLE OF DIVERGENT THINKING IN INTERPERSONAL TRUST DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: CREATIVE ASPECTS
Author:
Palmiero Massimiliano1ORCID, Palumbo Rocco2ORCID, Ceccato Irene2ORCID, La Malva Pasquale2ORCID, Di Crosta Adolfo2ORCID, Fusi Giulia3ORCID, Crepaldi Maura3ORCID, Rusconi Maria Luisa3ORCID, Di Domenico Alberto2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Communication Sciences, University of Teramo, Campus “Aurelio Saliceti” Via R. Balzarini 1, 64100 Teramo, Italy 2. Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, D’Annunzio University of Chieti–Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy 3. Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Piazzale S. Agostino, 2, 24129 Bergamo, Italy
Abstract
Interpersonal trust relies on positive expectations about other people. Social psychology distinguishes ingroup (individuals share social identity, e.g., family) from outgroup trust (individuals do not share social identity, e.g., strangers). We conducted an experimental study to test if divergent thinking, which relies on an inclusive processing mode, differently affected ingroup and outgroup trust during the lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. A sample of 114 healthy college students, with no prior or current COVID-19 infection (mean age = 23.66, sd = 2.53, 89% women) was recruited. Interpersonal trust was measured by three ingroup and three outgroup trust items. Divergent thinking was measured by the alternative uses task, which asked to find alternative uses for common objects. Divergent thinking was scored by two independent raters in terms of fluency and quality of ideas. To control for generalized anxiety and mood states, the generalized anxiety disorder scale and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule were administered, respectively. To control for the inclusiveness of divergent thinking performance, the alternative uses task was administered using three types of instructions. Thus, the sample was divided in three groups of 38 participants according to the divergent thinking task instructions: “be-fluent: find as many different uses for the objects”, “be-creative: find creative uses for the objects”, and “be fluent and creative: find as many different and creative uses of the objects”. The hierarchical regression analyses showed that the quality, but not the quantity of divergent thinking positively predicted only outgroup trust, whereas the mood positively predicted ingroup trust. Divergent thinking task instructions did not affect interpersonal trust. Thus, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the quality of divergent thinking supports only outgroup trust based on the inclusive processing mode, meaning that people showing high ability to produce uncommon, remote and clever ideas are more inclusive and by consequence more prone to trust strangers. Limitations and implications are discussed.
Publisher
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,Cultural Studies
Reference74 articles.
1. Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2019). Divergent thinking: New methods, recent research, and extended theory. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 153-158. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000231 2. Acar, S., Runco, M. A., & Park, H. (2020). What should people be told when they take a divergent thinking test? A meta-analytic review of explicit instructions for divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000256 3. Algan, Y., Guriev, S., Papaioannou, E., & Passari, E. (2018). The European trust crisis and the rise of populism. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Working Paper Series, 208. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3128274 4. Allison, P. D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Pine Forge Press, Inc. 5. Balliet, D., & Lange, van P. A. M. (2013). Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1090-1112. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030939
|
|