1. Measuring Congruence of Ranking Results Applying Particular MCDM Methods
2. Automobilių kelių investicijų vadovas. KIV-06-1. [Guide to Automobile Road Investment] . 2006 .Lithunian Road Administration under the Ministry of Transport and Communications of the Republic of Lithuania. , Vilnius , Lithuania , 85 p.
3. Bekefi , Z. ; Kiss , L. N. ; Tanczos , K 2003 . Multi-criteria analysis of the financial feasibility of transport in- frastructure projects in Hungary , INFOR 2003 [online], [cited 07 July, 2009]. Available from Internet: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3661/is_200302/ai_n9188263/?tag=content;col1
4. Beria , P. ; Maltese , I. ; Mariotti , I 2010 . Comparing cost benefit and multi-criteria analysis: the evalua- tion of neighbourhoods’ sustainable mobility[online]. University of Mesina, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Finanziarie, Sociali, Ambientali e Statistiche (SEFISAST) , Italy [cited 16 August, 2011]. Available from Internet: http://ww2.unime.it/sefisast/SEFISAST/Conference_Paper_files/BERIA_MALTESE_MARIOTTI.pdf
5. Why Cost Benefit Analysis is perceived as a problematic tool for assessment of transport plans: A process perspective