Author:
Saggu Khyati,Pal Shilpa,Dev Nirendra
Abstract
Masonry infrastructure repair is a daunting challenge. The short intervention and limited resources have led to the loss of novel rendering and finishing materials. In the present study, the bibliometric analysis is conducted for period 2003 to 2022. Co-cited reference analysis, keywords, cluster, and temporal evolution were used for analysis using Citespace software. Additionally, summary of suitable content showed that major challenges in this field are disparities in the properties of old mortar and new materials and the lack of documents to understand nature and methodology of construction. Based on the analysis and content review, a suggestive technique is proposed inculcating four aspects: Finite element analysis, preparing numerical models, improvised techniques for bonding mechanisms and understanding mechanical attributes.
Publisher
Global Academic Digital Library
Reference50 articles.
1. A. Moropoulou and A. Bakolas, “Criteria and methodology for restoration mortars compatible to the historic materials and structures,” 2000. Accessed: Mar. 01, 2023.
2. “The world heritage fund / le fonds du patrimoine mondial statement of assessed contributions as at 30 November 2022 / etat des contributions mises en recouvrement au 30 novembre 2022.”
3. G. Ma, L. Wang, and Y. Ju, “State-of-the-art of 3D printing technology of cementitious material—an emerging technique for construction,” Sci China Technol Sci, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 475–495, 2018.
4. M. E. Loke, K. Pallav, and R. Haldenwang, “Characterisation of heritage cementing materials for restoration purposes: A review,” Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 10–21, 2020.
5. D. Y. Wu, S. Meure, and D. Solomon, “Self-healing polymeric materials: A review of recent developments,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 479–522, 2008.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献