1. The Canadian high court also observed that construing a permanent travel restriction on one parent as creating a right of custody in the other has“serious implications of the mobility rights of the custodian.”Thomson,3S. C. R., at 590, 119 D. L. R., at 281. A French Court of Appeals made a similar observation inAttorney for the Republic at Périgueuxv.Mrs. S, T. G. I. Périgueux, Mar. 17, 1992, Rev. cr. dr. internat. Privé 82(4) Oct.–Déc. 1993, 650, 651–653.