Coding Methods for Enhanced Manual Data Transcripts: Contributing to Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)

Author:

Jesus Leonora F. de,Andres Teody C. San,Andres Christian B. San

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to explore the graduate school writers' intentions and behaviors related to adopting different manual coding methods.   Theoretical Framework: In this topic, the main concepts and theories that underpin the research are presented. In this study, the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB )stand out, providing a solid basis for understanding the context of the investigation.   Method: The methodology adopted for this research comprises Multi-phase Mixed-method; Frequency, Mean and Standard Deviation for quantitative was employed; Different Coding such as Emotion, In-vivo, Descriptive and Axial Coding Methods were also utilized for qualitative part. A probability sampling approach was employed. The Coding Manual for qualitative researchers by Saldana (2014) was adopted for instrumentation.   Results and Discussion: The survey reveals a moderate level of understanding and proficiency in manual coding methods and theming. While respondents excel in foundational coding principles, there is room for improvement in using multiple coding methods and in vivo coding. The findings suggest that writers predominantly rely on traditional coding methods, revealing a gap in understanding and application of effective coding techniques and thematic analysis. Bridging the gap between traditional and alternative coding methods is crucial to advancing research practices in graduate school settin.   Research Implications: The practical and theoretical implications of this research are discussed, providing insights into how the results can be applied or influence practices in the field of Research. By addressing mentioned challenges, writers can improve the accuracy and depth of their data analysis, leading to more robust and meaningful research outcomes. In conclusion, there is a need to bridge the gap between the traditional coding method currently employed by graduate school writers and the alternative coding methods available. Additionally, providing training and support to enhance their understanding and application of coding methods and thematic analysis will contribute to the advancement of their research practices and ultimately lead to more comprehensive and insightful findings   Originality/Value: This study contributes to the literature by providing valuable insights into the prevailing reliance on traditional coding methods among graduate school writers, thereby addressing Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4 on quality education. It highlights the associated challenges in effectively coding and theming qualitative data, revealing a gap between awareness and application of alternative coding techniques. The research highlight the urgent need for enhanced training and support in research practices, advocating for increased adoption of more effective coding methods. By improving the accuracy and depth of data analysis, this initiative not only aims to address current shortcomings but also seeks to advance qualitative research practices, fostering more robust and insightful research outcomes in academia

Publisher

South Florida Publishing LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3