Abstract
AbstractTheoretical models often differ significantly from measured data in their predictions of the magnitude of nuclear reactions that produce radionuclides for medical, research, and national security applications. In this paper, we compare a priori predictions from several state-of-the-art reaction modeling packages (CoH, EMPIRE, TALYS, and ALICE) to cross sections measured using the stacked-target activation method. The experiment was performed using the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 88-Inch Cyclotron with beams of 25 and 55 MeV protons on a stack of iron, copper, and titanium foils. Thirty-four excitation functions were measured from 4–55 MeV, including the first measurement of the independent cross sections for $$^{\mathrm{nat}}\hbox {Fe}$$
nat
Fe
(p,x)$$^{49,51}\hbox {Cr}$$
49
,
51
Cr
, $$^{51,{\mathrm{52m}},{\mathrm{52g}},56}\hbox {Mn}$$
51
,
52
m
,
52
g
,
56
Mn
, and $$^{{\mathrm{58m,58g}}}\hbox {Co}$$
58
m
,
58
g
Co
. All of the models, using default input parameters to assess their predictive capabilities, failed to reproduce the isomer-to-ground state ratio for reaction channels at compound and pre-compound energies, suggesting issues in modeling the deposition or distribution of angular momentum in these residual nuclei.
Funder
U.S. Department of Energy Isotope Program
U.S. Nuclear Data Program
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献