$$p\bar{\varLambda }$$ final-state interaction in the reactions $$e^+e^- \rightarrow K^- p \bar{\varLambda }$$ and $$J/\psi \rightarrow K^- p \bar{\varLambda }$$
-
Published:2024-05-31
Issue:5
Volume:60
Page:
-
ISSN:1434-601X
-
Container-title:The European Physical Journal A
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Eur. Phys. J. A
Author:
Haidenbauer Johann,Meißner Ulf-G.
Abstract
AbstractNear-threshold $$p\bar{\Lambda }$$
p
Λ
¯
mass spectra for the reactions $$e^+e^- \rightarrow K^- p\bar{\Lambda }$$
e
+
e
-
→
K
-
p
Λ
¯
and $$J/\psi \rightarrow K^- p\bar{\Lambda }$$
J
/
ψ
→
K
-
p
Λ
¯
are investigated with an emphasis on the role played by the interaction in the $$p\bar{\Lambda }$$
p
Λ
¯
system. As guideline for the $$p\bar{\Lambda }$$
p
Λ
¯
interaction a variety of $$\Lambda \bar{\Lambda }$$
Λ
Λ
¯
potential models is considered that have been established in the analysis of data on $$p{\bar{p}}\rightarrow \Lambda \bar{\Lambda }$$
p
p
¯
→
Λ
Λ
¯
in the past. Arguments why the properties of the $$p\bar{\Lambda }$$
p
Λ
¯
and $$\Lambda \bar{\Lambda }$$
Λ
Λ
¯
interactions can be expected to be very similar are provided. It is shown that the near-threshold enhancement in the invariant mass observed for the $$e^+e^-$$
e
+
e
-
reaction can be reproduced quantitatively by the assumed $$p\bar{\Lambda }$$
p
Λ
¯
final-state interaction in the partial wave suggested by an amplitude analysis of the experiment. The effect of the $$p\bar{\Lambda }$$
p
Λ
¯
final-state interaction in other decays is explored, including the recently measured reactions $$B^- \rightarrow J/\psi \, {\bar{p}} \Lambda $$
B
-
→
J
/
ψ
p
¯
Λ
and $$B^+ \rightarrow J/\psi \, p \bar{\Lambda }$$
B
+
→
J
/
ψ
p
Λ
¯
. It is found that the final-state interaction improves the description of the measured invariant mass near threshold in most cases.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
H2020 European Research Council
Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference66 articles.
1. J.Z. Bai et al., BES. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 022001 (2003)
2. J.P. Alexander et al., CLEO. Phys. Rev. D 82, 092002 (2010)
3. M. Ablikim et al., BESIII. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 112003 (2012)
4. M. Ablikim et al., BES. Phys. Rev. D 80, 052004 (2009)
5. J.P. Lees et al., Phys. Rev. D 87, 092005 (2013)