Abstract
AbstractIn this paper we revisit $$D_s \rightarrow f_0(980)$$
D
s
→
f
0
(
980
)
form factors from the light-cone sum rules based on the $${\bar{q}}q$$
q
¯
q
picture of $$f_0(980)$$
f
0
(
980
)
. The main motivation of this study is the decay width of $$D_s^+ \rightarrow \left[ \pi \pi \right] _{S}^{\textrm{I} = 0} e^+ \nu _e$$
D
s
+
→
π
π
S
I
=
0
e
+
ν
e
measured recently by BESIII collaboration and the $$D_s \rightarrow f_0(980)$$
D
s
→
f
0
(
980
)
form factor extracted under the resonant model, here the subscript S and superscript $$\textrm{I}=0$$
I
=
0
indicate the S-wave isoscalar dipion system. Our result of the differential width of $$D_s^+ \rightarrow f_0(980) (\rightarrow \left[ \pi \pi \right] _{S}^{\textrm{I} = 0}) e^+ \nu _e$$
D
s
+
→
f
0
(
980
)
(
→
π
π
S
I
=
0
)
e
+
ν
e
decay obtained under the narrow width approximation is lower than the data, the result obtained under the resonant Flatté model is consistent with the data, indicating a sizable mixing $$\sim 20^{\circ }$$
∼
20
∘
between $${\bar{s}}s$$
s
¯
s
and $${\bar{u}}u+{\bar{d}}d$$
u
¯
u
+
d
¯
d
of $$f_0$$
f
0
. In order to get a model independent prediction, we suggest to calculate $$D_s \rightarrow \left[ \pi \pi \right] ^{\textrm{I} = 0}$$
D
s
→
π
π
I
=
0
form factors with the isoscalar dipion light-cone distribution amplitudes. Our calculation of $$D_s \rightarrow \left[ \pi \pi \right] ^{\textrm{I} = 0}$$
D
s
→
π
π
I
=
0
form factors is carried out at leading twist level due to the finite knowledge of dipion system, the differential width shows a moderate evolution in contrast to that obtained from the narrow width approximation and the Flatté model. Since the $$D_s \rightarrow f_0(980)$$
D
s
→
f
0
(
980
)
form factors is dominated by the twist three contribution, further measurements on four-body semileptonic charm decays would help us to study the dimeson light-cone distribution amplitudes, especially for the subleading twist one.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference74 articles.
1. B. El-Bennich, O. Leitner, J.P. Dedonder, B. Loiseau, Phys. Rev. D 79, 076004 (2009)
2. N. Offen, F.A. Porkert, A. Schäfer, Phys. Rev. D 88(3), 034023 (2013)
3. I. Bediaga, M. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. D 68, 036001 (2003)
4. M. Ablikim et al., [BESIII], arXiv:2306.05194 [hep-ex]
5. H.Y. Cheng, C.K. Chua, K.C. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 73, 014017 (2006)