Author:
Dalla Brida Mattia,Höllwieser Roman,Knechtli Francesco,Korzec Tomasz,Nada Alessandro,Ramos Alberto,Sint Stefan,Sommer Rainer,
Abstract
AbstractWe present the details and first results of a new strategy for the determination of $$\alpha _s(m_Z)$$
α
s
(
m
Z
)
(ALPHA Collaboration et al. in Phys. Lett. B 807:135571, 2020). By simultaneously decoupling 3 fictitious heavy quarks we establish a relation between the $$\Lambda $$
Λ
-parameters of three-flavor QCD and pure gauge theory. Very precise recent results in the pure gauge theory (Dalla Brida and Ramos in Eur. Phys. J. C 79(8):720, 2019; Nada and Ramos in Eur Phys J C 81(1):1, 2021) can thus be leveraged to obtain the three-flavour $$\Lambda $$
Λ
-parameter in units of a common decoupling scale. Connecting this scale to hadronic physics in 3-flavour QCD leads to our result in physical units, $$\Lambda ^{(3)}_{\overline{\textrm{MS}}} = 336(12)\, {\textrm{MeV}}$$
Λ
MS
¯
(
3
)
=
336
(
12
)
MeV
, which translates to $$\alpha _s(m_Z) = 0.11823(84)$$
α
s
(
m
Z
)
=
0.11823
(
84
)
. This is compatible with both the FLAG average (Aoki et al. in FLAG review 2021. arXiv:2111.09849 [hep-lat]) and the previous ALPHA result (ALPHA Collaboration et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(10):102001, 2017), with a comparable, yet still statistics dominated, error. This constitutes a highly non-trivial check, as the decoupling strategy is conceptually very different from the 3-flavour QCD step-scaling method, and so are their systematic errors. These include the uncertainties of the combined decoupling and continuum limits, which we discuss in some detail. We also quantify the correlation between both results, due to some common elements, such as the scale determination in physical units and the definition of the energy scale where we apply decoupling.
Funder
H2020 European Institute of Innovation and Technology
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
North-German supercomputer alliance
Partnership for Advanced Computing in Europe AISBL
Generalitat Valenciana
SFB
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous),Engineering (miscellaneous)
Reference106 articles.
1. ATLAS Collaboration. https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PUBNOTES/ATL-PHYS-PUB-2019-024/
2. Particle Data Group Collaboration, P.A. Zyla et al., Review of particle physics. PTEP 2020(8), 083C01 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptaa104
3. Flavour Lattice Averaging Group Collaboration, S. Aoki et al., FLAG review 2019. Eur. Phys. J. C 80(2), 113 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7354-7. arXiv:1902.08191 [hep-lat]
4. Y. Aoki et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 82(10), 869 (2022). arXiv:2111.09849 [hep-lat]
5. L. Del Debbio, A. Ramos, Lattice determinations of the strong coupling. Phys. Rep. 920, 1–71 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2021.03.005. arXiv:2101.04762 [hep-lat]
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献