Abstract
AbstractAccurate nuclear data are essential in the evaluation of decay heat from spent nuclear fuel (SNF). The accuracy of such data was assessed using an approach that compares values reported in different evaluated libraries and determines whether discrepancies reflect inaccuracies in primary data. A short list of 43 isotopes which are most significant to SNF decay heat calculations over 1–100 k years was produced by combining generic reactor inventory code with decay heat analysis for undifferentiated SNF. Decay properties (half-lives and decay energies) and neutron interactions (cross section and fission yields) were compared from 6 evaluated libraries. Fission product (FP) discrepancies identified are 90Sr half-life, where inclusion of a single measurement significantly reduces the evaluated value; 95mNb beta energy, where DDEP evaluation omits the decay to the 95Mo ground state; 99Tc beta energy, where evaluations differ by approximately 10% with a variety of shape factors used; 126Sb/126mSb beta (JEF2.2/3.1.1/3.3) and electron energies (JEFF3.1.1), where intensity differences are reported; and 137Cs beta energy, where ENDF/B-VIII.0 and JEF3.3 evaluations use incorrect shape factors. For actinides, the major discrepancies identified were 237Np alpha energy (JEF2.2/3.1.1) and 225Ac electron energies (ENDF/B-VIII.0) but overall show less discrepancies during long-term disposal (0.1–100 ky) compared to FP’s during interim storage (1–100 years). Further assessments of the 90Sr half-life and the best shape factor for the 99Tc beta decay are needed to improve future decay heat analyses, which are important for designing future stores and evaluating schemes for possible heat recovery.
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy
Reference33 articles.
1. A. Algora, D. Jordan, J.L. Taín, B. Rubio, J. Agramunt, A.B. Perez-Cerdan et al., Reactor decay heat in Pu239: solving the $$\gamma $$ discrepancy in the 4–3000-s cooling period. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.202501
2. A. Algora, D. Jordan, J.L. Taín, B. Rubio, J. Agramunt, L. Caballero et al., Decay heat studies for nuclear energy. Hyperfine Interact. 223(1–3), 245–252 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10751-012-0623-6
3. D.A. Rochman, A. Vasiliev, A. Dokhane, H. Ferroukhi, Uncertainties for Swiss LWR spent nuclear fuels due to nuclear data. EPJ Nucl. Sci. Technol. 4(6), 1–15 (2018)
4. D. Rochman, A. Dokhane, A. Vasiliev, H. Ferroukhi, M. Hursin, Nuclear data uncertainties for Swiss BWR spent nuclear fuel characteristics. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135(2), 233 (2020)
5. A.J. Cresswell, D.C.W. Sanderson, J. Carter, Review of nuclear data for naturally occurring radionuclides applied to environmental applications. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134(2), 1–19 (2019)
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献