Author:
Candia Cristian,Encarnação Sara,Pinheiro Flávio L.
Abstract
AbstractData on the applicants’ revealed preferences when entering higher education is used as a proxy to build the Higher Education Space (HES) of Portugal (2008–2015) and Chile (2006–2017). The HES is a network that connects pairs of degree programs according to their co-occurrence in the applicants’ preferences. We show that both HES network structures reveal the existence of positive assortment in features such as gender balance, application scores, unemployment levels, academic demand/supply ratio, geographical mobility, and first-year drop-out rates. For instance, if a degree program exhibits a high prevalence of female candidates, its nearest degree programs in the HES will also tend to exhibit a higher prevalence when compared to the prevalence in the entire system. These patterns extend up to two or three links of separation, vanishing, or inverting for increasing distances. Moreover, we show that for demand/supply ratio and application scores a similar pattern occurs for time variations. Finally, we provide evidence that information embedded in the HES is not accessible by merely considering the features of degree programs independently. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the higher education systems at revealing and leveraging its non-trivial underlying organizing principles. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first network science approach for improving decision-making and governance in higher education systems.
Funder
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
A3ES - Agência de Avaliação e Acreditação do Ensino Superior
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computational Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Modeling and Simulation
Reference58 articles.
1. Archer L, Hutchings M, Ross A (2005) Higher education and social class: issues of exclusion and inclusion. Routledge, London
2. Reay D, Davies J, David M, Ball SJ (2001) Choices of degree or degrees of choice? Class, ‘race’ and the higher education choice process. Sociol 35(4):855–874
3. Sewell WH, Shah VP (1967) Socioeconomic status, intelligence, and the attainment of higher education. Sociol Educ, 1–23
4. Goyette KA, Mullen AL (2006) Who studies the arts and sciences? Social background and the choice and consequences of undergraduate field of study. J High Educ 77(3):497–538
5. Barone C (2011) Some things never change: gender segregation in higher education across eight nations and three decades. Sociol Educ 84(2):157–176
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献