Diversity dilemmas: uncovering gender and nationality biases in graduate admissions across top North American computer science programs

Author:

Kalhor GhazalORCID,Zeraati Tanin,Bahrak Behnam

Abstract

AbstractAlthough different organizations have defined policies towards diversity in academia, many argue that minorities are still disadvantaged in university admissions due to biases. Extensive research has been conducted on detecting partiality patterns in the academic community. However, in the last few decades, limited research has focused on assessing gender and nationality biases in graduate admission results of universities. In this study, we collected a novel and comprehensive dataset containing information on approximately 14,000 graduate students majoring in computer science (CS) at the top 25 North American universities. We used statistical hypothesis tests to determine whether there is a preference for students’ gender and nationality in the admission processes. In addition to partiality patterns, we discuss the relationship between gender/nationality diversity and the scientific achievements of research teams. Consistent with previous studies, our findings show that there is no gender bias in the admission of graduate students to research groups, but we observed bias based on students’ nationality.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Computational Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Modeling and Simulation

Reference39 articles.

1. Sharaievska I, Kono S, Mirehie MS (2019) Are we speaking the same language? The experiences of international students and scholars in North American higher education. SCHOLE, J Leis Stud Recreat Educ 34(2):120–131

2. Posselt JR (2014) Toward inclusive excellence in graduate education: constructing merit and diversity in PhD admissions. Am J Educ 120(4):481–514

3. Bollinger L (2007) Why diversity matters. Educ Dig 73(2):26

4. Smith DG (2020) Diversity’s promise for higher education: making it work

5. Maruyama G, Moreno JF (2000) University faculty views about the value of diversity on campus and in the classroom. Does diversity make a difference? Three research studies on diversity in college classrooms, 9–35

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3