Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization

Author:

Kobellarz Jordan K.ORCID,Broćić Miloš,Graeml Alexandre R.,Silver Daniel,Silva Thiago H.

Abstract

AbstractPolitics in different countries show diverse degrees of polarization, which tends to be stronger on social media, given how easy it became to connect and engage with like-minded individuals on the web. A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations, i.e., “reaching the bubbles”. This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada. We collected politics-related tweets shared during the 2018 Brazilian presidential election and the 2019 Canadian federal election. Next, we proposed an updated centrality metric that enables identifying highly central bubble reachers, nodes that can distribute content among users with diverging political opinions—a fundamental metric for the proposed study. After that, we analyzed how users engage with news content shared by bubble reachers, its source, and its topics, considering its political orientation. Among other results, we found that, even though news media disseminate content that interests different sides of the political spectrum, users tend to engage considerably more with content that aligns with their political orientation, regardless of the topic.

Funder

FAPESP

CNPq

Connaught Fund

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Computational Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Modeling and Simulation

Reference43 articles.

1. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol 27(1):415–444

2. Pariser E (2011) The filter bubble: what the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Books Limited, UK

3. Burt RS (2003) The social structure of competition. Netw Knowl Econ 13:57–91

4. Kobellarz JK, Graeml A, Reddy M, Silva TH (2019) Parrot talk: retweeting among Twitter users during the 2018 Brazilian presidential election. In: Proc. of ACM webmedia, SBC, Rio de Janeiro, pp 221–228

5. McEwan B, Carpenter CJ, Hopke JE (2018) Mediated skewed diffusion of issues information: a theory. Soc Media Soc 4(3):1–14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3