Abstract
Objective. To study the factors affecting the success of embryo transfers (ET). Materials and methods. 1087 ET in zebu cattle were analyzed. The considered extrinsic factors of the donor cows were the cattle production unit from which they were sourced (n=13), amount of transfers in the unit (1 time, >1 time), geographical zone (n=4), period (dry or rainy) and year season; and the intrinsic factors were the breed of the bull and DC, semen, embryo quality and embryo developmental stage. Statistics were compiled with ci2 for the analysis of the main effects, and correlations were estimated through a multivariate clustering analysis. Results. The general pregnancy rate was 37.99±1.47, and there were differences (p<0.05) observed among the CPU (2.78–75%). The PR was higher in the dry than in the rainy period (44.55 vs 31.28%), and in fall and winter (p<0.05) than spring and summer (42.76, 43.98, 37.57 and 29.77%, respectively), and there were differences observed between the geographical zones as well (p<0.05). The PR was higher with excellent-quality embryos (p<0.05) than with good-quality embryos (38.9 vs. 26.3%). The period and year season had an effect over the RC (p<0.05), and the grouping analysis showed a correlation (r>0.90) between the period and year season during Oocyte pick-up (OPU) over the PR; moreover, semen, EQ and EDS had larger associations with the PR (r>0.80). Conclusions. Environmental conditions at the moment of OPU and EQ are factors worth considering in embryo transfer programs with zebu cattle using in vitro produced embryos in tropical conditions.
Reference33 articles.
1. Duica AA, Tovío LN, Grajales LH. Factores que afectan la eficiencia reproductiva de la hembra receptora en un programa de trasplante de embriones bovinos. Revista de Medicina Veterinaria 2007; 14:107-124. https://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/mv
2. Galli C, Crotti G, Notari C, Turini P, Duchi R, Lazzari G. Embryo production by ovum pick up from live donors. Theriogenology. 2001; 55(6):1341–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(01)00486-1
3. Soria M, Soria C, Méndez S, Argudo D, Serpa G, Torres C. et al. Valoración de dos protocolos de superovulación para la producción de embriones en vacas Holstein. Rev Prod Anim. 2018; 30(2):52-56. http://dspace.ucuenca.edu.ec/handle/123456789/30584
4. Kafi M, McGowan MR. Factors associated with variation in the superovulatory response of cattle. Animal reproduction science. 1997; 48(2-4):137–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4320(97)00033-x
5. Ferraz PA, Burnley C, Karanja J, Viera-Neto A, Santos JE, Chebel RC, Galvão KN. Factors affecting the success of a large embryo transfer program in Holstein cattle in a commercial herd in the southeast region of the United States. Theriogenology. 2016; 86(7):1834–1841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.05.032