Implementation of E-assessment in Higher Education

Author:

Shalatska Hanna,Zotova-Sadylo Olena,Makarenko Olexandr,Dzevytska Larysa

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to develop the methodical recommendations for test-designers to cope with challenges of organizing on-line assessment process. In order to achieve this goal we have to reveal the strengths and weaknesses of e-assessment activities based on analysis of the universities practice. To find out students’ attitude to the issue of the study we have drawn up the questionnaire. The survey results confirm that e-assessment is rated as priority activity by learners thanks to individual approach to teaching/learning process, easily accessible and fast feedback, as well as interactive methods of implementation. Reviewing practical experience of Kryvyi Rih National University (KNU) and Donetsk Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine (DLI) and summarizing statistical data of the survey we have developed methodical support for designing e-assessment activities which involves: to determine intended recipients and the purpose of testing; select appropriate instruments and e-platform; specify forms of feedback; clarify the tasks; provide knowledge base for operating e-tests etc. Despite plenty of studies in this domain the test-designers and test-takers face to typical difficulties while operating e-assessment, and there is lack of research providing methodical practicalities in this field. To address learners’ and lecturers’ needs we have developed the methodical recommendations, which might be used in the drafting of e-assessment tests for students of different specialisms.

Publisher

[б. в.]

Reference21 articles.

1. 1. Abdelkader, A., Souilem, D., Braham, R.: E-Assessment System Based on IMS QTI for the Arabic Grammar. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. 5, 94-99 (2014).http://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2014.051013

2. 2. Alruwais, N., Wills, G., Wald, M.: Advantages and Challenges of Using e-Assessment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 8 (1), 34-37 (2018). http://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.1.1008

3. 3. Bachman, L., Palmer, A.: Languge Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests. Oxford University Press (1996)

4. 4. Bloom, B.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. Longmans (1956)

5. 5. Buzzetto-More, N., Pinhey, K.: Evaluating e-Learning for Quality Assurance. Advanced Principles of Effective e-Learning Santa Rosa. California, Informing Science Press (2007)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3