Author:
Shalatska Hanna,Zotova-Sadylo Olena,Makarenko Olexandr,Dzevytska Larysa
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to develop the methodical recommendations for test-designers to cope with challenges of organizing on-line assessment process. In order to achieve this goal we have to reveal the strengths and weaknesses of e-assessment activities based on analysis of the universities practice. To find out students’ attitude to the issue of the study we have drawn up the questionnaire. The survey results confirm that e-assessment is rated as priority activity by learners thanks to individual approach to teaching/learning process, easily accessible and fast feedback, as well as interactive methods of implementation. Reviewing practical experience of Kryvyi Rih National University (KNU) and Donetsk Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine (DLI) and summarizing statistical data of the survey we have developed methodical support for designing e-assessment activities which involves: to determine intended recipients and the purpose of testing; select appropriate instruments and e-platform; specify forms of feedback; clarify the tasks; provide knowledge base for operating e-tests etc. Despite plenty of studies in this domain the test-designers and test-takers face to typical difficulties while operating e-assessment, and there is lack of research providing methodical practicalities in this field. To address learners’ and lecturers’ needs we have developed the methodical recommendations, which might be used in the drafting of e-assessment tests for students of different specialisms.
Reference21 articles.
1. 1. Abdelkader, A., Souilem, D., Braham, R.: E-Assessment System Based on IMS QTI for the Arabic Grammar. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. 5, 94-99 (2014).http://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2014.051013
2. 2. Alruwais, N., Wills, G., Wald, M.: Advantages and Challenges of Using e-Assessment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 8 (1), 34-37 (2018). http://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.1.1008
3. 3. Bachman, L., Palmer, A.: Languge Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests. Oxford University Press (1996)
4. 4. Bloom, B.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. Longmans (1956)
5. 5. Buzzetto-More, N., Pinhey, K.: Evaluating e-Learning for Quality Assurance. Advanced Principles of Effective e-Learning Santa Rosa. California, Informing Science Press (2007)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献