Author:
Bogaty Chloe,Frambach Janneke
Abstract
Background: The CanMEDS Competency Framework is an internationally recognized model used to outline the proficiencies of a physician. It has predominantly been studied in clinical environments but not all medical specialties take part in direct patient contact. In laboratory medicine, the role of the physician is to promote and enhance patient diagnostics by managing and overseeing the functions of a diagnostic laboratory.
Methods: This phenomenographic study explores the lived experiences of biochemistry, microbiology, and pathology residency program directors to better understand how they utilize the CanMEDS competencies. Eight laboratory medicine program directors from across Canada were individually interviewed using a semi-structured interview, and the data was analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
Results: The findings show that the current framework is disconnected from the unique context of laboratory medicine with some competencies appearing unrelatable using the current standardized definitions and expectations. Nevertheless, participants considered the framework to be an appropriate blueprint of the competencies necessary for their professional environment, but to make it accessible more autonomy is required to adapt the framework to their needs.
Conclusion: Newer renditions of the CanMEDS Competency Framework should better consider the realities of non-clinical disciplines.
Publisher
The Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada
Reference31 articles.
1. ACGME International. ACGME International Home. Chicago USA; 2000 (updated 2022). Available from: https://www.acgme-i.org [Accessed on Dec 8, 2022].
2. Frank JR, Snell L, Sherbino J, editors. CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework. Ottawa (Canada): Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2015.
3. Tromp F, Vernooij-Dassen M, Grol R, Kramer A, Bottema B. Assessment of CanMEDS roles in postgraduate training: the validation of the Compass. Patient Educ Couns. 2012(89):199-204. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.028
4. Norman G, Sherbino J, Dore K, et al. The etiology of diagnostic errors: a controlled trial of system 1 versus system 2 reasoning. Acad Med. 2014;89(2):277-284. http://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000105
5. Kogan JR, Holmboe S. Preparing residents for practice in new systems of care by preparing their teachers. Acad Med. 2014;89(11):1436-1437. http://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000480