Perioperative Differences between Bone Bridging and Non-Bone Bridging Transtibial Amputations for Wartime Lower Extremity Trauma

Author:

Gwinn David E.1,Keeling John1,Froehner Jerald W.1,McGuigan Francis X.2,Andersen Romney3

Affiliation:

1. Orthopedic Surgery Service, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, MD

2. Orthopedic Surgery Department, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC

3. Orthopedic Surgery Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC

Abstract

Background: The distal bone bridge transtibial amputation technique requires additional intraoperative surgical steps when compared to the non-bone bridging technique. Comparative functional data is not available showing a clearly superior outcome from either technique. Identifying perioperative differences could influence a surgeon's decision regarding the technique of amputation to be performed. This study's purpose was to compare perioperative differences between bone bridging transtibial amputation and non-bone bridging amputation techniques. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review from April 2004 to April 2007 identified 37 consecutive patients with 42 transtibial amputations as a result of wartime blast injuries. Twenty-two non-bone bridging and twenty bone bridging amputations were performed. Statistical comparisons of intraoperative time, tourniquet time, estimated blood loss, the need for postoperative transfusion and frequency of wound complications was performed. Results: The bone bridging amputation technique had significantly longer operative times (178.5 vs. 112.2 minutes, p < 0.0005) and tourniquet times (114.8 vs. 71.0 minutes, p < 0.0005). Regardless of technique used, amputations performed within the zone of injury had a 66.7% wound complication rate ( p < 0.0005). There was not a statistically significant difference in reoperation for wound complications between groups when controlling for zone of injury: bone bridge (6.3%) and non-bone bridge (0.0%). Amputation closure performed within the zone of injury was a significant predictor for subsequent wound problems regardless of amputation technique. Conclusion: Longer operative and tourniquet times should not be considered a contraindication to utilizing the bone bridging amputation technique in younger and otherwise healthy patients. Both amputation techniques have comparable rates of short term wound complications and associated blood loss. Wound closure for traumatic amputations should not be perfomed through the zone of injury.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Amputaciones y desarticulaciones de los miembros: miembro inferior;EMC - Técnicas Quirúrgicas - Ortopedia y Traumatología;2022-08

2. Amputazioni e disarticolazioni di arti: arto inferiore;EMC - Tecniche Chirurgiche - Chirurgia Ortopedica;2022

3. Amputation Surgeries for the Lower Limb;Orthotics and Prosthetics in Rehabilitation;2020

4. The effectiveness of the bone bridge transtibial amputation technique;Prosthetics & Orthotics International;2017-06

5. Transtibial Amputation Outcomes Study (TAOS): Comparing Transtibial Amputation With and Without a Tibiofibular Synostosis (Ertl) Procedure;Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma;2017-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3