Results of Endoscopic Plantar Fascia Release

Author:

Bazaz Rajesh1,Ferkel Richard D.2

Affiliation:

1. Western Orthopaedics, Denver, CO

2. Southern California Orthopaedic Institute, Van Nuys, CA

Abstract

Background: Conservative treatment for plantar fasciitis usually provides improvement, but some patients progress to surgery. Open release is most commonly performed but is associated with prolonged recovery and complications. Endoscopic plantar fascia release (EPFR) has become popular recently. We present our results. Methods: Twenty patients (23 feet) had EPFR. Sixteen patients (19 feet) were available for followup after at least 1 year. Ten were women and 6 were men, with an average age of 44.7 (range 28 to 70) years. The average followup was 47 months. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale and Maryland Foot Score were used for evaluation. Gender, obesity, severity, length of preoperative symptoms, and workers compensation (WC) status were studied. Results: The average AOFAS and Maryland scores improved postoperatively (66 to 88, p < 0.05; 62 to 83, p < 0.05, respectively). Women improved 25 (AOFAS) and 23 points (Maryland) points. Men improved 16 (AOFAS) and 17 points (Maryland) points. Obese patients improved 38 and 28 points, respectively. Normal weight patients improved 16 and 19 points, respectively. Postoperative scores for patients with high preoperative severity improved from 58 to 81 (AOFAS) and from 52 to 73 (Maryland). Patients with moderate preoperative severity achieved scores from 72 to 93 and from 70 to 91. Patients who had symptoms longer than 2 years before EPFR had lower postoperative scores. Non-WC patients improved 25 (AOFAS) and 24 (Maryland) points. WC patients improved 18 and 16 points, respectively. Conclusions: EPFR provides significantly improved patient outcomes. Patients with more severe symptoms before EPFR and those with symptoms for longer than 2 years had worse results. Obesity had no negative effect on outcome. WC patients had inferior results compared to non-WC patients. Women achieved better results than men. This finding may be biased because most WC patients were men.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3